From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yw0-f42.google.com (mail-yw0-f42.google.com [209.85.213.42]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23CE9B70D0 for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 21:51:18 +1000 (EST) Received: by ywa6 with SMTP id 6so2093276ywa.15 for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 04:51:17 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: MPC8641D PEX: programming OWBAR in Endpoint mode? From: David Hagood To: "tiejun.chen" In-Reply-To: <4C9DC510.8010403@windriver.com> References: <08f8439b89ad5771221aaba1cee86fc4.squirrel@localhost> <52CF90264091A14888078A031D780F4306C8C0FF@ism-mail03.corp.ad.wrs.com> <1285240268.2454.8.camel@chumley> <52CF90264091A14888078A031D780F4306C8C14B@ism-mail03.corp.ad.wrs.com> <409c3f6d508ece73c18f6ce750513b22.squirrel@localhost> <52CF90264091A14888078A031D780F4306C8C176@ism-mail03.corp.ad.wrs.com> <1285325425.2454.11.camel@chumley> <4C9DC510.8010403@windriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 06:51:13 -0500 Message-ID: <1285415473.2454.15.camel@chumley> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, 2010-09-25 at 17:46 +0800, tiejun.chen wrote: > As a summary you have no any issue to access InBound/BAR/LAW. Correct: full access to the inbound. > And I remember there is only one > requirement to OutBound, and that is the window address should be aligned based > on the size from OWS. Are you sure? Yes. As my first test I've been using 4k and 64k sizes, aligned on 16M boundaries. > > And did you try to configure OutBound REGS when RC mode? If so I'm afraid we may > miss some errata on EP. In RC mode the built-in drivers take over.