From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: pacman@kosh.dhis.org
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: memory corrupting bug, bisected to 6dda9d55
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 21:32:16 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1287570736.2198.19.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101020032345.5240.qmail@kosh.dhis.org>
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 22:23 -0500, pacman@kosh.dhis.org wrote:
> The diff fragment above applied inside prom_close_stdin, but there are
> some
> prom_printf calls after prom_close_stdin. Calling prom_printf after
> closing
> stdout sounds like it could be bad. If I moved it down below all the
> prom_printf's, it would be after the "quiesce" call. Would that be
> acceptable
> (or even interesting as an experiment)? Does a close need a quiesce
> after it?
Just try :-) "quiesce" is something that afaik only apple ever
implemented anyways. It uses hooks inside their OF to shut down all
drivers that do bus master (among other HW sanitization tasks).
Cheers,
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-20 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20101009095718.1775.qmail@kosh.dhis.org>
[not found] ` <20101011143022.GD30667@csn.ul.ie>
2010-10-11 21:00 ` PROBLEM: memory corrupting bug, bisected to 6dda9d55 Andrew Morton
2010-10-13 14:40 ` Mel Gorman
2010-10-13 17:52 ` pacman
2010-10-18 11:33 ` Mel Gorman
2010-10-18 19:10 ` pacman
2010-10-18 21:10 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-10-18 21:33 ` pacman
2010-10-19 10:16 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-10-19 18:10 ` pacman
2010-10-19 20:47 ` Segher Boessenkool
2010-10-19 21:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-10-20 3:23 ` pacman
2010-10-20 10:32 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2010-10-20 18:33 ` pacman
2010-10-20 20:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-10-22 9:15 ` pacman
2010-10-27 8:57 ` Pegasos OHCI bug (was Re: PROBLEM: memory corrupting bug, bisected to 6dda9d55) pacman
2010-10-27 10:13 ` Olaf Hering
2010-10-27 21:04 ` Pegasos OHCI bug (was Re: PROBLEM: memory corrupting bug, pacman
2010-10-27 22:05 ` Segher Boessenkool
2010-10-27 22:58 ` pacman
2010-10-27 23:33 ` Segher Boessenkool
2010-10-28 1:11 ` pacman
2010-10-28 19:50 ` Segher Boessenkool
2010-10-28 21:07 ` pacman
2010-10-29 0:16 ` Segher Boessenkool
2010-11-05 6:43 ` pacman
2010-11-29 5:44 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-10-27 13:27 ` Pegasos OHCI bug (was Re: PROBLEM: memory corrupting bug, bisected to 6dda9d55) Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-10-19 20:58 ` PROBLEM: memory corrupting bug, bisected to 6dda9d55 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-10-18 19:37 ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-18 21:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-10-18 21:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-10-19 16:24 ` Helmut Grohne
2010-10-19 16:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-10-18 20:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1287570736.2198.19.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=pacman@kosh.dhis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).