linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
Cc: Linux PPC Development <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: Change in PCI behaviour
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 08:46:58 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1290203218.32570.48.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CE69AF6.6090408@mlbassoc.com>

On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 08:42 -0700, Gary Thomas wrote:
> In this case, note that PCI device 0000:00:0c.0 is at 0xc0000000.
> This causes problems because it's a truly stupid device that does
> not work properly at PCI [relative] address 0x00000000.  It simply
> does not respond at that address.  Pick anywhere else and it will
> work fine! 

Hrm, we used to have a trick avoid giving out the first meg of a bus to
avoid that sort of thing, I suppose it got lost. The rest is related to
the way you map your PCI I suppose in your dts. You can switch back to a
1:1 instead of 1:0 mapping I suppose.

One way to achieve the above result would be to, in your platform code,
reserve the mem region that corresponds to PCI 0...1M (c0000000...+1M)
before the device resources are assigned/allocated.

I though we had code to do that with the "legacy" regions somewhere...
oh well, no code at hand to check right now.

Cheers,
Ben.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-19 21:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-19 15:42 Change in PCI behaviour Gary Thomas
2010-11-19 21:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2010-11-21 17:59   ` Gary Thomas
2010-11-22 10:01     ` Gary Thomas
2010-11-22 20:26       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-11-23 14:44         ` Gary Thomas
2010-12-04 12:49           ` Gary Thomas
2010-12-04 21:07             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-11-22 10:37 ` Gabriel Paubert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1290203218.32570.48.camel@pasglop \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=gary@mlbassoc.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).