From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 497E0B7043 for ; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 07:52:40 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: RFC: Mega rename of device tree routines from of_*() to dt_*() From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Geert Uytterhoeven In-Reply-To: References: <1290607413.12457.44.camel@concordia> <1290692075.689.20.camel@concordia> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 07:52:04 +1100 Message-ID: <1290718324.32570.127.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linux-arch , linux-mips , microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, LKML , linuxppc-dev list , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 15:01 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > I always read it as "for each child-OF-node", so I would rename it to > "dt_for_each_child_node". Well, it was meant to be for_child_of_node not _OF_node :-) Cheers, Ben.