From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
Cc: Linux PPC Development <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: Change in PCI behaviour
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 08:07:49 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1291496869.2820.8.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CFA38D8.3060209@mlbassoc.com>
On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 05:49 -0700, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 11/23/2010 07:44 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> > On 11/22/2010 01:26 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 03:01 -0700, Gary Thomas wrote:
> >>> I have a bit more information on this. I'm pretty sure that the failures
> >>> are only happening in my SCSI (SATA actually) code. My board (8347ea)
> >>> has
> >>> a PCI bus with a SIL SATA controller. This combo works perfectly in
> >>> 2.6.28.
> >>> In 2.6.32, it will run for a while (possibly quite a while), then
> >>> timeout
> >>> trying to do a large block write - typically 256 blocks. Once this
> >>> timeout
> >>> happens, the SIL controller is stuck and accesses to it will eventually
> >>> cause the whole system to hang (as above).
> >>>
> >>> Was there any major change in how PCI or DMA was handled between 2.6.28
> >>> and 2.6.32? Given the ephemeral nature of these failures (multiple runs
> >>> all eventually fail, but never the same twice), my only hope of
> >>> fixing it
> >>> will be to have some ideas what might have changed.
> >>
> >> Maybe the changes you did to the PCI outbound windows are now breaking
> >> DMA ? Make sure the outbound and inbound don't overlap for example and
> >> that all RAM is reachable for inbound.
> >
> > Here's what I did to work around this - in my DTS, I set up my PCI as
> > ranges = <0x02000000 0x0 0xC4000000 0xC4000000 0x0 0x1C000000
> > 0x01000000 0x0 0x00000000 0xB8000000 0x0 0x00100000>;
> > Before, I had it as
> > ranges = <0x02000000 0x0 0xC0000000 0xC0000000 0x0 0x20000000
> > 0x01000000 0x0 0x00000000 0xB8000000 0x0 0x00100000>;
> >
> > I wasn't sure how to reserve the memory (based on your earlier suggestion),
> > so I just narrowed the window. Note that I did not change the PCI hardware
> > registers (maybe the FSL code does?), so the outbound window should still
> > be the whole 512MB.
> >
> > If this isn't viable, perhaps you could explain a bit more how to reserve
> > such a chunk of memory so that the PCI mappings remain the same.
>
> Any ideas on this? I'm a bit lost as to how to reserve the memory like
> you suggested and what I've tried so far has met little success.
>
> Thanks again
>
Look at pcibios_reserve_legacy_regions() in
arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c, it "reserves" the legacy IO and VGA
regions on host bridges. You can make it reserve whatever your
device is allergic too.
Cheers,
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-04 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-19 15:42 Change in PCI behaviour Gary Thomas
2010-11-19 21:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-11-21 17:59 ` Gary Thomas
2010-11-22 10:01 ` Gary Thomas
2010-11-22 20:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-11-23 14:44 ` Gary Thomas
2010-12-04 12:49 ` Gary Thomas
2010-12-04 21:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2010-11-22 10:37 ` Gabriel Paubert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1291496869.2820.8.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=gary@mlbassoc.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).