* [PATCH 1/5] of/device: Centralize checking of 'status' properties
[not found] <cover.1291799069.git.deepak_saxena@mentor.com>
@ 2010-12-08 19:29 ` Deepak Saxena
2010-12-31 7:43 ` Grant Likely
2010-12-08 19:29 ` [PATCH 4/5] of/device: Create _of_get_next_child() Deepak Saxena
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Deepak Saxena @ 2010-12-08 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: devicetree-discuss; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
Don't call any of_platform_driver's probe() function if the device node is
not accessible (as denoted in the status property).
Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollis_blanchard@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Deepak Saxena <deepak_saxena@mentor.com>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/suspend.c | 3 ---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-core.c | 3 ---
drivers/net/gianfar.c | 2 +-
drivers/net/ibm_newemac/core.c | 2 +-
drivers/of/platform.c | 7 +++++--
5 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/suspend.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/suspend.c
index 75ae77f..a5a54aa 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/suspend.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/suspend.c
@@ -326,9 +326,6 @@ static int pmc_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev,
struct pmc_type *type = match->data;
int ret = 0;
- if (!of_device_is_available(np))
- return -ENODEV;
-
has_deep_sleep = type->has_deep_sleep;
immrbase = get_immrbase();
pmc_dev = ofdev;
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-core.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-core.c
index c51b711..51218d4 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-core.c
@@ -126,9 +126,6 @@ static int __devinit sdhci_of_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev,
int size;
int ret;
- if (!of_device_is_available(np))
- return -ENODEV;
-
host = sdhci_alloc_host(&ofdev->dev, sizeof(*of_host));
if (IS_ERR(host))
return -ENOMEM;
diff --git a/drivers/net/gianfar.c b/drivers/net/gianfar.c
index d1bec62..9918914 100644
--- a/drivers/net/gianfar.c
+++ b/drivers/net/gianfar.c
@@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ static int gfar_of_init(struct platform_device *ofdev, struct net_device **pdev)
unsigned int num_tx_qs, num_rx_qs;
u32 *tx_queues, *rx_queues;
- if (!np || !of_device_is_available(np))
+ if (!np)
return -ENODEV;
/* parse the num of tx and rx queues */
diff --git a/drivers/net/ibm_newemac/core.c b/drivers/net/ibm_newemac/core.c
index 06bb9b7..290fff2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ibm_newemac/core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ibm_newemac/core.c
@@ -2732,7 +2732,7 @@ static int __devinit emac_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev,
* property here for now, but new flat device trees should set a
* status property to "disabled" instead.
*/
- if (of_get_property(np, "unused", NULL) || !of_device_is_available(np))
+ if (of_get_property(np, "unused", NULL))
return -ENODEV;
/* Find ourselves in the bootlist if we are there */
diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
index 5b4a07f..14370a0 100644
--- a/drivers/of/platform.c
+++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
@@ -56,7 +56,10 @@ static int platform_driver_probe_shim(struct platform_device *pdev)
* come up empty. Return -EINVAL in this case so other drivers get
* the chance to bind. */
match = of_match_device(pdev->dev.driver->of_match_table, &pdev->dev);
- return match ? ofpdrv->probe(pdev, match) : -EINVAL;
+ if (match && of_device_is_available(pdev->dev.of_node))
+ return ofpdrv->probe(pdev, match);
+
+ return -EINVAL;
}
static void platform_driver_shutdown_shim(struct platform_device *pdev)
@@ -142,7 +145,7 @@ static int of_platform_device_probe(struct device *dev)
of_dev_get(of_dev);
match = of_match_device(drv->driver.of_match_table, dev);
- if (match)
+ if (match && of_device_is_available(dev->of_node))
error = drv->probe(of_dev, match);
if (error)
of_dev_put(of_dev);
--
1.6.3.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/5] of/device: Create _of_get_next_child()
[not found] <cover.1291799069.git.deepak_saxena@mentor.com>
2010-12-08 19:29 ` [PATCH 1/5] of/device: Centralize checking of 'status' properties Deepak Saxena
@ 2010-12-08 19:29 ` Deepak Saxena
2010-12-08 19:29 ` [PATCH 5/5] of/device: Show even unavailable nodes in procfs Deepak Saxena
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Deepak Saxena @ 2010-12-08 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: devicetree-discuss; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
There aren't many, but some of_get_next_child() callers do need an unabridged
view of the device tree so we provide a wrapper that can be used by them.
Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollis_blanchard@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Deepak Saxena <deepak_saxena@mentor.com>
---
drivers/of/base.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/of.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
index 81b2601..7bc1398 100644
--- a/drivers/of/base.c
+++ b/drivers/of/base.c
@@ -315,6 +315,32 @@ struct device_node *of_get_next_parent(struct device_node *node)
}
/**
+ * _of_get_next_child - Iterate a node childs
+ * @node: parent node
+ * @prev: previous child of the parent node, or NULL to get first
+ *
+ * Returns a node pointer with refcount incremented, use
+ * of_node_put() on it when done.
+ *
+ * Unlike most other node accessors, ignores status properties.
+ */
+struct device_node *_of_get_next_child(const struct device_node *node,
+ struct device_node *prev)
+{
+ struct device_node *next;
+
+ read_lock(&devtree_lock);
+ next = prev ? prev->sibling : node->child;
+ for (; next; next = next->sibling)
+ if (of_device_is_available(next) && of_node_get(next))
+ break;
+ of_node_put(prev);
+ read_unlock(&devtree_lock);
+ return next;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(_of_get_next_child);
+
+/**
* of_get_next_child - Iterate a node childs
* @node: parent node
* @prev: previous child of the parent node, or NULL to get first
diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
index cad7cf0..1fea01d 100644
--- a/include/linux/of.h
+++ b/include/linux/of.h
@@ -175,6 +175,8 @@ extern struct device_node *of_find_node_by_path(const char *path);
extern struct device_node *of_find_node_by_phandle(phandle handle);
extern struct device_node *of_get_parent(const struct device_node *node);
extern struct device_node *of_get_next_parent(struct device_node *node);
+extern struct device_node *_of_get_next_child(const struct device_node *node,
+ struct device_node *prev);
extern struct device_node *of_get_next_child(const struct device_node *node,
struct device_node *prev);
#define for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) \
--
1.6.3.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 5/5] of/device: Show even unavailable nodes in procfs
[not found] <cover.1291799069.git.deepak_saxena@mentor.com>
2010-12-08 19:29 ` [PATCH 1/5] of/device: Centralize checking of 'status' properties Deepak Saxena
2010-12-08 19:29 ` [PATCH 4/5] of/device: Create _of_get_next_child() Deepak Saxena
@ 2010-12-08 19:29 ` Deepak Saxena
2010-12-08 19:29 ` [PATCH 3/5] of/device: Make of_get_next_child() check status properties Deepak Saxena
2010-12-08 19:29 ` [PATCH 2/5] of/device: make for_each_node* " Deepak Saxena
4 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Deepak Saxena @ 2010-12-08 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: devicetree-discuss; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
Use the new "raw" of_get_next_child() variant so all device tree nodes
will appear in procfs.
Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollis_blanchard@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Deepak Saxena <deepak_saxena@mentor.com>
---
fs/proc/proc_devtree.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
index d9396a4..aa914eb 100644
--- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *np,
const char *p;
set_node_proc_entry(np, de);
- for (child = NULL; (child = of_get_next_child(np, child));) {
+ for (child = NULL; (child = _of_get_next_child(np, child));) {
/* Use everything after the last slash, or the full name */
p = strrchr(child->full_name, '/');
if (!p)
--
1.6.3.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/5] of/device: Make of_get_next_child() check status properties
[not found] <cover.1291799069.git.deepak_saxena@mentor.com>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-12-08 19:29 ` [PATCH 5/5] of/device: Show even unavailable nodes in procfs Deepak Saxena
@ 2010-12-08 19:29 ` Deepak Saxena
2010-12-08 21:01 ` Scott Wood
2010-12-08 19:29 ` [PATCH 2/5] of/device: make for_each_node* " Deepak Saxena
4 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Deepak Saxena @ 2010-12-08 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: devicetree-discuss; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
We only return the next child if the device is available.
Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollis_blanchard@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Deepak Saxena <deepak_saxena@mentor.com>
---
drivers/of/base.c | 4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
index 5d269a4..81b2601 100644
--- a/drivers/of/base.c
+++ b/drivers/of/base.c
@@ -321,6 +321,8 @@ struct device_node *of_get_next_parent(struct device_node *node)
*
* Returns a node pointer with refcount incremented, use
* of_node_put() on it when done.
+ *
+ * Does not return nodes marked unavailable by a status property.
*/
struct device_node *of_get_next_child(const struct device_node *node,
struct device_node *prev)
@@ -330,7 +332,7 @@ struct device_node *of_get_next_child(const struct device_node *node,
read_lock(&devtree_lock);
next = prev ? prev->sibling : node->child;
for (; next; next = next->sibling)
- if (of_node_get(next))
+ if (of_device_is_available(next) && of_node_get(next))
break;
of_node_put(prev);
read_unlock(&devtree_lock);
--
1.6.3.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/5] of/device: make for_each_node* check status properties
[not found] <cover.1291799069.git.deepak_saxena@mentor.com>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-12-08 19:29 ` [PATCH 3/5] of/device: Make of_get_next_child() check status properties Deepak Saxena
@ 2010-12-08 19:29 ` Deepak Saxena
2010-12-31 7:46 ` Grant Likely
4 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Deepak Saxena @ 2010-12-08 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: devicetree-discuss; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
Some early device drivers don't actually implement a struct of_platform_driver,
and instead use the for_each_node* iterators to search for matching device
nodes. Disabled device nodes will no longer be returned by these iterators.
Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollis_blanchard@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Deepak Saxena <deepak_saxena@mentor.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c | 2 --
arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/usb.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_mds.c | 13 ++-----------
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c | 5 -----
arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_pci.c | 15 ---------------
drivers/of/base.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
6 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c
index e751506..fa4f719 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c
@@ -310,8 +310,6 @@ static void __devinit __of_scan_bus(struct device_node *node,
/* Scan direct children */
for_each_child_of_node(node, child) {
pr_debug(" * %s\n", child->full_name);
- if (!of_device_is_available(child))
- continue;
reg = of_get_property(child, "reg", ®len);
if (reg == NULL || reglen < 20)
continue;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/usb.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/usb.c
index 3ba4bb7..749c70b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/usb.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/usb.c
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ int mpc837x_usb_cfg(void)
int ret = 0;
np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "fsl-usb2-dr");
- if (!np || !of_device_is_available(np))
+ if (!np)
return -ENODEV;
prop = of_get_property(np, "phy_type", NULL);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_mds.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_mds.c
index aa34cac..5d1a33f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_mds.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_mds.c
@@ -170,10 +170,8 @@ static void __init mpc85xx_publish_qe_devices(void)
struct device_node *np;
np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "fsl,qe");
- if (!of_device_is_available(np)) {
- of_node_put(np);
+ if (!np)
return;
- }
of_platform_bus_probe(NULL, mpc85xx_qe_ids, NULL);
}
@@ -267,11 +265,6 @@ static void __init mpc85xx_mds_qe_init(void)
return;
}
- if (!of_device_is_available(np)) {
- of_node_put(np);
- return;
- }
-
qe_reset();
of_node_put(np);
@@ -328,10 +321,8 @@ static void __init mpc85xx_mds_qeic_init(void)
struct device_node *np;
np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "fsl,qe");
- if (!of_device_is_available(np)) {
- of_node_put(np);
+ if (!np)
return;
- }
np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "fsl,qe-ic");
if (!np) {
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c
index 818f7c6..fba4ec7 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c
@@ -623,11 +623,6 @@ int __init mpc83xx_add_bridge(struct device_node *dev)
is_mpc83xx_pci = 1;
- if (!of_device_is_available(dev)) {
- pr_warning("%s: disabled by the firmware.\n",
- dev->full_name);
- return -ENODEV;
- }
pr_debug("Adding PCI host bridge %s\n", dev->full_name);
/* Fetch host bridge registers address */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_pci.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_pci.c
index 156aa7d..cf2adec 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_pci.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_pci.c
@@ -321,13 +321,6 @@ static void __init ppc4xx_probe_pci_bridge(struct device_node *np)
const int *bus_range;
int primary = 0;
- /* Check if device is enabled */
- if (!of_device_is_available(np)) {
- printk(KERN_INFO "%s: Port disabled via device-tree\n",
- np->full_name);
- return;
- }
-
/* Fetch config space registers address */
if (of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &rsrc_cfg)) {
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Can't get PCI config register base !",
@@ -1890,14 +1883,6 @@ static void __init ppc4xx_probe_pciex_bridge(struct device_node *np)
port = &ppc4xx_pciex_ports[portno];
port->index = portno;
- /*
- * Check if device is enabled
- */
- if (!of_device_is_available(np)) {
- printk(KERN_INFO "PCIE%d: Port disabled via device-tree\n", port->index);
- return;
- }
-
port->node = of_node_get(np);
pval = of_get_property(np, "sdr-base", NULL);
if (pval == NULL) {
diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
index 710b53b..5d269a4 100644
--- a/drivers/of/base.c
+++ b/drivers/of/base.c
@@ -344,6 +344,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_get_next_child);
*
* Returns a node pointer with refcount incremented, use
* of_node_put() on it when done.
+ *
+ * Does not return nodes marked unavailable by a status property.
*/
struct device_node *of_find_node_by_path(const char *path)
{
@@ -352,6 +354,7 @@ struct device_node *of_find_node_by_path(const char *path)
read_lock(&devtree_lock);
for (; np; np = np->allnext) {
if (np->full_name && (of_node_cmp(np->full_name, path) == 0)
+ && of_device_is_available(np)
&& of_node_get(np))
break;
}
@@ -370,6 +373,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_find_node_by_path);
*
* Returns a node pointer with refcount incremented, use
* of_node_put() on it when done.
+ *
+ * Does not return nodes marked unavailable by a status property.
*/
struct device_node *of_find_node_by_name(struct device_node *from,
const char *name)
@@ -380,6 +385,7 @@ struct device_node *of_find_node_by_name(struct device_node *from,
np = from ? from->allnext : allnodes;
for (; np; np = np->allnext)
if (np->name && (of_node_cmp(np->name, name) == 0)
+ && of_device_is_available(np)
&& of_node_get(np))
break;
of_node_put(from);
@@ -399,6 +405,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_find_node_by_name);
*
* Returns a node pointer with refcount incremented, use
* of_node_put() on it when done.
+ *
+ * Does not return nodes marked unavailable by a status property.
*/
struct device_node *of_find_node_by_type(struct device_node *from,
const char *type)
@@ -409,6 +417,7 @@ struct device_node *of_find_node_by_type(struct device_node *from,
np = from ? from->allnext : allnodes;
for (; np; np = np->allnext)
if (np->type && (of_node_cmp(np->type, type) == 0)
+ && of_device_is_available(np)
&& of_node_get(np))
break;
of_node_put(from);
@@ -430,6 +439,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_find_node_by_type);
*
* Returns a node pointer with refcount incremented, use
* of_node_put() on it when done.
+ *
+ * Does not return nodes marked unavailable by a status property.
*/
struct device_node *of_find_compatible_node(struct device_node *from,
const char *type, const char *compatible)
@@ -442,7 +453,9 @@ struct device_node *of_find_compatible_node(struct device_node *from,
if (type
&& !(np->type && (of_node_cmp(np->type, type) == 0)))
continue;
- if (of_device_is_compatible(np, compatible) && of_node_get(np))
+ if (of_device_is_compatible(np, compatible)
+ && of_device_is_available(np)
+ && of_node_get(np))
break;
}
of_node_put(from);
@@ -462,6 +475,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_find_compatible_node);
*
* Returns a node pointer with refcount incremented, use
* of_node_put() on it when done.
+ *
+ * Does not return nodes marked unavailable by a status property.
*/
struct device_node *of_find_node_with_property(struct device_node *from,
const char *prop_name)
@@ -472,6 +487,8 @@ struct device_node *of_find_node_with_property(struct device_node *from,
read_lock(&devtree_lock);
np = from ? from->allnext : allnodes;
for (; np; np = np->allnext) {
+ if (!of_device_is_available(np))
+ continue;
for (pp = np->properties; pp != 0; pp = pp->next) {
if (of_prop_cmp(pp->name, prop_name) == 0) {
of_node_get(np);
@@ -526,6 +543,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_match_node);
*
* Returns a node pointer with refcount incremented, use
* of_node_put() on it when done.
+ *
+ * Does not return nodes marked unavailable by a status property.
*/
struct device_node *of_find_matching_node(struct device_node *from,
const struct of_device_id *matches)
@@ -535,7 +554,9 @@ struct device_node *of_find_matching_node(struct device_node *from,
read_lock(&devtree_lock);
np = from ? from->allnext : allnodes;
for (; np; np = np->allnext) {
- if (of_match_node(matches, np) && of_node_get(np))
+ if (of_match_node(matches, np)
+ && of_device_is_available(np)
+ && of_node_get(np))
break;
}
of_node_put(from);
--
1.6.3.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/5] of/device: Make of_get_next_child() check status properties
2010-12-08 19:29 ` [PATCH 3/5] of/device: Make of_get_next_child() check status properties Deepak Saxena
@ 2010-12-08 21:01 ` Scott Wood
2010-12-09 1:33 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Scott Wood @ 2010-12-08 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Deepak Saxena; +Cc: devicetree-discuss, linuxppc-dev
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:29:44 -0800
Deepak Saxena <deepak_saxena@mentor.com> wrote:
> We only return the next child if the device is available.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollis_blanchard@mentor.com>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak Saxena <deepak_saxena@mentor.com>
> ---
> drivers/of/base.c | 4 +++-
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
> index 5d269a4..81b2601 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
> @@ -321,6 +321,8 @@ struct device_node *of_get_next_parent(struct device_node *node)
> *
> * Returns a node pointer with refcount incremented, use
> * of_node_put() on it when done.
> + *
> + * Does not return nodes marked unavailable by a status property.
> */
> struct device_node *of_get_next_child(const struct device_node *node,
> struct device_node *prev)
> @@ -330,7 +332,7 @@ struct device_node *of_get_next_child(const struct device_node *node,
> read_lock(&devtree_lock);
> next = prev ? prev->sibling : node->child;
> for (; next; next = next->sibling)
> - if (of_node_get(next))
> + if (of_device_is_available(next) && of_node_get(next))
> break;
> of_node_put(prev);
> read_unlock(&devtree_lock);
This seems like too low-level a place to put this. Some code may know
how to un-disable a device in certain situations, or it may be part of
debug code trying to dump the whole device tree, etc. Looking
further[1], I see a raw version of this function, but not other things
like of_find_compatible_node.
Could this be done more othogonally, so that the caller specifies in a
parameter whether to skip based on status?
-Scott
[1] For some reason I received some of these patches from
linuxppc-dev, and others from devicetree-discuss. I wish lists
wouldn't try to be "smart" about discarding duplicates -- it messes with
filters.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/5] of/device: Make of_get_next_child() check status properties
2010-12-08 21:01 ` Scott Wood
@ 2010-12-09 1:33 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-12-09 3:09 ` David Gibson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-12-09 1:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Scott Wood; +Cc: devicetree-discuss, linuxppc-dev, Deepak Saxena
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2048 bytes --]
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 15:01 -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:29:44 -0800
> Deepak Saxena <deepak_saxena@mentor.com> wrote:
>
> > We only return the next child if the device is available.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollis_blanchard@mentor.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Deepak Saxena <deepak_saxena@mentor.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/of/base.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
> > index 5d269a4..81b2601 100644
> > --- a/drivers/of/base.c
> > +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
> > @@ -321,6 +321,8 @@ struct device_node *of_get_next_parent(struct device_node *node)
> > *
> > * Returns a node pointer with refcount incremented, use
> > * of_node_put() on it when done.
> > + *
> > + * Does not return nodes marked unavailable by a status property.
> > */
> > struct device_node *of_get_next_child(const struct device_node *node,
> > struct device_node *prev)
> > @@ -330,7 +332,7 @@ struct device_node *of_get_next_child(const struct device_node *node,
> > read_lock(&devtree_lock);
> > next = prev ? prev->sibling : node->child;
> > for (; next; next = next->sibling)
> > - if (of_node_get(next))
> > + if (of_device_is_available(next) && of_node_get(next))
> > break;
> > of_node_put(prev);
> > read_unlock(&devtree_lock);
>
> This seems like too low-level a place to put this. Some code may know
> how to un-disable a device in certain situations, or it may be part of
> debug code trying to dump the whole device tree, etc. Looking
> further[1], I see a raw version of this function, but not other things
> like of_find_compatible_node.
Yeah I agree. I think we'll eventually end up with __ versions of all or
lots of them. Not to mention there might be cases you've missed where
code expects to see unavailable nodes. The right approach is to add
_new_ routines that don't return unavailable nodes, and convert code
that you know wants to use them.
cheers
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/5] of/device: Make of_get_next_child() check status properties
2010-12-09 1:33 ` Michael Ellerman
@ 2010-12-09 3:09 ` David Gibson
2010-12-15 18:35 ` Hollis Blanchard
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: David Gibson @ 2010-12-09 3:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Ellerman; +Cc: Scott Wood, devicetree-discuss, linuxppc-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2729 bytes --]
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 12:33:22PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 15:01 -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> > On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:29:44 -0800
> > Deepak Saxena <deepak_saxena@mentor.com> wrote:
> >
> > > We only return the next child if the device is available.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollis_blanchard@mentor.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Deepak Saxena <deepak_saxena@mentor.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/of/base.c | 4 +++-
> > > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
> > > index 5d269a4..81b2601 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/of/base.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
> > > @@ -321,6 +321,8 @@ struct device_node *of_get_next_parent(struct device_node *node)
> > > *
> > > * Returns a node pointer with refcount incremented, use
> > > * of_node_put() on it when done.
> > > + *
> > > + * Does not return nodes marked unavailable by a status property.
> > > */
> > > struct device_node *of_get_next_child(const struct device_node *node,
> > > struct device_node *prev)
> > > @@ -330,7 +332,7 @@ struct device_node *of_get_next_child(const struct device_node *node,
> > > read_lock(&devtree_lock);
> > > next = prev ? prev->sibling : node->child;
> > > for (; next; next = next->sibling)
> > > - if (of_node_get(next))
> > > + if (of_device_is_available(next) && of_node_get(next))
> > > break;
> > > of_node_put(prev);
> > > read_unlock(&devtree_lock);
> >
> > This seems like too low-level a place to put this. Some code may know
> > how to un-disable a device in certain situations, or it may be part of
> > debug code trying to dump the whole device tree, etc. Looking
> > further[1], I see a raw version of this function, but not other things
> > like of_find_compatible_node.
>
> Yeah I agree. I think we'll eventually end up with __ versions of all or
> lots of them. Not to mention there might be cases you've missed where
> code expects to see unavailable nodes. The right approach is to add
> _new_ routines that don't return unavailable nodes, and convert code
> that you know wants to use them.
Actually, I don't think we really want these status-skipping
iterators at all. The device tree iterators should give us the device
tree, as it is. Those old-style drivers which seach for a node rather
than using the bus probing logic can keep individual checks of the
status property until they're converted to the new scheme.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/5] of/device: Make of_get_next_child() check status properties
2010-12-09 3:09 ` David Gibson
@ 2010-12-15 18:35 ` Hollis Blanchard
2010-12-15 22:40 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Hollis Blanchard @ 2010-12-15 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Ellerman, Scott Wood, devicetree-discuss, linuxppc-dev
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:09 PM, David Gibson
<david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 12:33:22PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 15:01 -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
>> > On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:29:44 -0800
>> > Deepak Saxena <deepak_saxena@mentor.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > We only return the next child if the device is available.
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollis_blanchard@mentor.com>
>> > > Signed-off-by: Deepak Saxena <deepak_saxena@mentor.com>
>> > > ---
>> > > =A0drivers/of/base.c | =A0 =A04 +++-
>> > > =A01 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
>> > > index 5d269a4..81b2601 100644
>> > > --- a/drivers/of/base.c
>> > > +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
>> > > @@ -321,6 +321,8 @@ struct device_node *of_get_next_parent(struct de=
vice_node *node)
>> > > =A0 *
>> > > =A0 * =A0 =A0 =A0 Returns a node pointer with refcount incremented, =
use
>> > > =A0 * =A0 =A0 =A0 of_node_put() on it when done.
>> > > + *
>> > > + * =A0 =A0 =A0 Does not return nodes marked unavailable by a status=
property.
>> > > =A0 */
>> > > =A0struct device_node *of_get_next_child(const struct device_node *n=
ode,
>> > > =A0 struct device_node *prev)
>> > > @@ -330,7 +332,7 @@ struct device_node *of_get_next_child(const stru=
ct device_node *node,
>> > > =A0 read_lock(&devtree_lock);
>> > > =A0 next =3D prev ? prev->sibling : node->child;
>> > > =A0 for (; next; next =3D next->sibling)
>> > > - =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 if (of_node_get(next))
>> > > + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 if (of_device_is_available(next) && of_node_get(ne=
xt))
>> > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 break;
>> > > =A0 of_node_put(prev);
>> > > =A0 read_unlock(&devtree_lock);
>> >
>> > This seems like too low-level a place to put this. =A0Some code may kn=
ow
>> > how to un-disable a device in certain situations, or it may be part of
>> > debug code trying to dump the whole device tree, etc. =A0Looking
>> > further[1], I see a raw version of this function, but not other things
>> > like of_find_compatible_node.
>>
>> Yeah I agree. I think we'll eventually end up with __ versions of all or
>> lots of them. Not to mention there might be cases you've missed where
>> code expects to see unavailable nodes. The right approach is to add
>> _new_ routines that don't return unavailable nodes, and convert code
>> that you know wants to use them.
>
> Actually, I don't think we really want these status-skipping
> iterators at all. =A0The device tree iterators should give us the device
> tree, as it is. =A0Those old-style drivers which seach for a node rather
> than using the bus probing logic can keep individual checks of the
> status property until they're converted to the new scheme.
So the patch should look something like this?
@@ -321,6 +321,8 @@ struct device_node *of_get_next_parent(struct
device_node *node)
*
* Returns a node pointer with refcount incremented, use
* of_node_put() on it when done.
+ *
+ * Do not use this function.
*/
struct device_node *of_get_next_child(const struct device_node *node,
struct device_node *prev)
...
+ struct device_node *of_get_next_available_child(const struct
device_node *node,
+ struct device_node *prev)
+ ...
+ }
And then (almost) all the of_get_next_child() sites should be changed
to call the new function?
-Hollis
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/5] of/device: Make of_get_next_child() check status properties
2010-12-15 18:35 ` Hollis Blanchard
@ 2010-12-15 22:40 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-12-31 7:39 ` Grant Likely
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-12-15 22:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hollis Blanchard; +Cc: Scott Wood, devicetree-discuss, linuxppc-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3511 bytes --]
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 10:35 -0800, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:09 PM, David Gibson
> <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 12:33:22PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 15:01 -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:29:44 -0800
> >> > Deepak Saxena <deepak_saxena@mentor.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > We only return the next child if the device is available.
> >> > >
> >> > > Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollis_blanchard@mentor.com>
> >> > > Signed-off-by: Deepak Saxena <deepak_saxena@mentor.com>
> >> > > ---
> >> > > drivers/of/base.c | 4 +++-
> >> > > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >> > >
> >> > > diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
> >> > > index 5d269a4..81b2601 100644
> >> > > --- a/drivers/of/base.c
> >> > > +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
> >> > > @@ -321,6 +321,8 @@ struct device_node *of_get_next_parent(struct device_node *node)
> >> > > *
> >> > > * Returns a node pointer with refcount incremented, use
> >> > > * of_node_put() on it when done.
> >> > > + *
> >> > > + * Does not return nodes marked unavailable by a status property.
> >> > > */
> >> > > struct device_node *of_get_next_child(const struct device_node *node,
> >> > > struct device_node *prev)
> >> > > @@ -330,7 +332,7 @@ struct device_node *of_get_next_child(const struct device_node *node,
> >> > > read_lock(&devtree_lock);
> >> > > next = prev ? prev->sibling : node->child;
> >> > > for (; next; next = next->sibling)
> >> > > - if (of_node_get(next))
> >> > > + if (of_device_is_available(next) && of_node_get(next))
> >> > > break;
> >> > > of_node_put(prev);
> >> > > read_unlock(&devtree_lock);
> >> >
> >> > This seems like too low-level a place to put this. Some code may know
> >> > how to un-disable a device in certain situations, or it may be part of
> >> > debug code trying to dump the whole device tree, etc. Looking
> >> > further[1], I see a raw version of this function, but not other things
> >> > like of_find_compatible_node.
> >>
> >> Yeah I agree. I think we'll eventually end up with __ versions of all or
> >> lots of them. Not to mention there might be cases you've missed where
> >> code expects to see unavailable nodes. The right approach is to add
> >> _new_ routines that don't return unavailable nodes, and convert code
> >> that you know wants to use them.
> >
> > Actually, I don't think we really want these status-skipping
> > iterators at all. The device tree iterators should give us the device
> > tree, as it is. Those old-style drivers which seach for a node rather
> > than using the bus probing logic can keep individual checks of the
> > status property until they're converted to the new scheme.
>
> So the patch should look something like this?
>
> @@ -321,6 +321,8 @@ struct device_node *of_get_next_parent(struct
> device_node *node)
> *
> * Returns a node pointer with refcount incremented, use
> * of_node_put() on it when done.
> + *
> + * Do not use this function.
> */
> struct device_node *of_get_next_child(const struct device_node *node,
> struct device_node *prev)
Haha. No it should say "this function doesn't lie to you".
And the patch should say "this patch _doesn't_ subtly change all callers
of of_get_next_child() without carefully auditing them".
cheers
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/5] of/device: Make of_get_next_child() check status properties
2010-12-15 22:40 ` Michael Ellerman
@ 2010-12-31 7:39 ` Grant Likely
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2010-12-31 7:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Ellerman
Cc: Scott Wood, devicetree-discuss, linuxppc-dev, Hollis Blanchard
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 09:40:55AM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 10:35 -0800, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:09 PM, David Gibson
> > <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 12:33:22PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > >> On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 15:01 -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> > >> > On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:29:44 -0800
> > >> > Deepak Saxena <deepak_saxena@mentor.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > We only return the next child if the device is available.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollis_blanchard@mentor.com>
> > >> > > Signed-off-by: Deepak Saxena <deepak_saxena@mentor.com>
> > >> > > ---
> > >> > > drivers/of/base.c | 4 +++-
> > >> > > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > >> > >
> > >> > > diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
> > >> > > index 5d269a4..81b2601 100644
> > >> > > --- a/drivers/of/base.c
> > >> > > +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
> > >> > > @@ -321,6 +321,8 @@ struct device_node *of_get_next_parent(struct device_node *node)
> > >> > > *
> > >> > > * Returns a node pointer with refcount incremented, use
> > >> > > * of_node_put() on it when done.
> > >> > > + *
> > >> > > + * Does not return nodes marked unavailable by a status property.
> > >> > > */
> > >> > > struct device_node *of_get_next_child(const struct device_node *node,
> > >> > > struct device_node *prev)
> > >> > > @@ -330,7 +332,7 @@ struct device_node *of_get_next_child(const struct device_node *node,
> > >> > > read_lock(&devtree_lock);
> > >> > > next = prev ? prev->sibling : node->child;
> > >> > > for (; next; next = next->sibling)
> > >> > > - if (of_node_get(next))
> > >> > > + if (of_device_is_available(next) && of_node_get(next))
> > >> > > break;
> > >> > > of_node_put(prev);
> > >> > > read_unlock(&devtree_lock);
> > >> >
> > >> > This seems like too low-level a place to put this. Some code may know
> > >> > how to un-disable a device in certain situations, or it may be part of
> > >> > debug code trying to dump the whole device tree, etc. Looking
> > >> > further[1], I see a raw version of this function, but not other things
> > >> > like of_find_compatible_node.
> > >>
> > >> Yeah I agree. I think we'll eventually end up with __ versions of all or
> > >> lots of them. Not to mention there might be cases you've missed where
> > >> code expects to see unavailable nodes. The right approach is to add
> > >> _new_ routines that don't return unavailable nodes, and convert code
> > >> that you know wants to use them.
> > >
> > > Actually, I don't think we really want these status-skipping
> > > iterators at all. The device tree iterators should give us the device
> > > tree, as it is. Those old-style drivers which seach for a node rather
> > > than using the bus probing logic can keep individual checks of the
> > > status property until they're converted to the new scheme.
> >
> > So the patch should look something like this?
> >
> > @@ -321,6 +321,8 @@ struct device_node *of_get_next_parent(struct
> > device_node *node)
> > *
> > * Returns a node pointer with refcount incremented, use
> > * of_node_put() on it when done.
> > + *
> > + * Do not use this function.
> > */
> > struct device_node *of_get_next_child(const struct device_node *node,
> > struct device_node *prev)
>
> Haha. No it should say "this function doesn't lie to you".
>
> And the patch should say "this patch _doesn't_ subtly change all callers
> of of_get_next_child() without carefully auditing them".
Heh, Yes. The comments made on this patch are totally on-base. Not
all nodes are devices, and not all callers will want to skip nodes;
regardless of the reason for skipping. Case in point: the
/proc/device-tree support code.
If a caller needs a version of the function that skips unavailable
nodes, then that behaviour should be explicitly asked for. In this
case it should be a new function with a new name. Don't change the
behaviour out from under the existing users.
g.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/5] of/device: Centralize checking of 'status' properties
2010-12-08 19:29 ` [PATCH 1/5] of/device: Centralize checking of 'status' properties Deepak Saxena
@ 2010-12-31 7:43 ` Grant Likely
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2010-12-31 7:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Deepak Saxena; +Cc: devicetree-discuss, linuxppc-dev
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 11:29:13AM -0800, Deepak Saxena wrote:
> Don't call any of_platform_driver's probe() function if the device node is
> not accessible (as denoted in the status property).
>
> Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollis_blanchard@mentor.com>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak Saxena <deepak_saxena@mentor.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/suspend.c | 3 ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-core.c | 3 ---
> drivers/net/gianfar.c | 2 +-
> drivers/net/ibm_newemac/core.c | 2 +-
> drivers/of/platform.c | 7 +++++--
> 5 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/suspend.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/suspend.c
> index 75ae77f..a5a54aa 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/suspend.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/suspend.c
> @@ -326,9 +326,6 @@ static int pmc_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev,
> struct pmc_type *type = match->data;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - if (!of_device_is_available(np))
> - return -ENODEV;
> -
> has_deep_sleep = type->has_deep_sleep;
> immrbase = get_immrbase();
> pmc_dev = ofdev;
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-core.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-core.c
> index c51b711..51218d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-core.c
> @@ -126,9 +126,6 @@ static int __devinit sdhci_of_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev,
> int size;
> int ret;
>
> - if (!of_device_is_available(np))
> - return -ENODEV;
> -
> host = sdhci_alloc_host(&ofdev->dev, sizeof(*of_host));
> if (IS_ERR(host))
> return -ENOMEM;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/gianfar.c b/drivers/net/gianfar.c
> index d1bec62..9918914 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/gianfar.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/gianfar.c
> @@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ static int gfar_of_init(struct platform_device *ofdev, struct net_device **pdev)
> unsigned int num_tx_qs, num_rx_qs;
> u32 *tx_queues, *rx_queues;
>
> - if (!np || !of_device_is_available(np))
> + if (!np)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> /* parse the num of tx and rx queues */
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ibm_newemac/core.c b/drivers/net/ibm_newemac/core.c
> index 06bb9b7..290fff2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ibm_newemac/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ibm_newemac/core.c
> @@ -2732,7 +2732,7 @@ static int __devinit emac_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev,
> * property here for now, but new flat device trees should set a
> * status property to "disabled" instead.
> */
> - if (of_get_property(np, "unused", NULL) || !of_device_is_available(np))
> + if (of_get_property(np, "unused", NULL))
> return -ENODEV;
>
> /* Find ourselves in the bootlist if we are there */
> diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
> index 5b4a07f..14370a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
> @@ -56,7 +56,10 @@ static int platform_driver_probe_shim(struct platform_device *pdev)
> * come up empty. Return -EINVAL in this case so other drivers get
> * the chance to bind. */
> match = of_match_device(pdev->dev.driver->of_match_table, &pdev->dev);
> - return match ? ofpdrv->probe(pdev, match) : -EINVAL;
> + if (match && of_device_is_available(pdev->dev.of_node))
> + return ofpdrv->probe(pdev, match);
> +
> + return -EINVAL;
Hi Deepak,
This works for drivers still using the deprecated of_platform_driver
structure, but all of those users are being converted into
platform_drivers which do not use this shim. Fixing it here will not
work after conversion.
I think it would be better to inhibit the devices from getting registered in
the first place instead of short circuiting the probe path.
g.
> }
>
> static void platform_driver_shutdown_shim(struct platform_device *pdev)
> @@ -142,7 +145,7 @@ static int of_platform_device_probe(struct device *dev)
> of_dev_get(of_dev);
>
> match = of_match_device(drv->driver.of_match_table, dev);
> - if (match)
> + if (match && of_device_is_available(dev->of_node))
> error = drv->probe(of_dev, match);
> if (error)
> of_dev_put(of_dev);
> --
> 1.6.3.3
>
> _______________________________________________
> devicetree-discuss mailing list
> devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/5] of/device: make for_each_node* check status properties
2010-12-08 19:29 ` [PATCH 2/5] of/device: make for_each_node* " Deepak Saxena
@ 2010-12-31 7:46 ` Grant Likely
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2010-12-31 7:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Deepak Saxena; +Cc: devicetree-discuss, linuxppc-dev
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 11:29:57AM -0800, Deepak Saxena wrote:
> Some early device drivers don't actually implement a struct of_platform_driver,
> and instead use the for_each_node* iterators to search for matching device
> nodes. Disabled device nodes will no longer be returned by these iterators.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollis_blanchard@mentor.com>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak Saxena <deepak_saxena@mentor.com>
As already discussed, the generic device tree iterator and search
functions should not be filtering the results as done here.
g.
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c | 2 --
> arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/usb.c | 2 +-
> arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_mds.c | 13 ++-----------
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c | 5 -----
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_pci.c | 15 ---------------
> drivers/of/base.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 6 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c
> index e751506..fa4f719 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c
> @@ -310,8 +310,6 @@ static void __devinit __of_scan_bus(struct device_node *node,
> /* Scan direct children */
> for_each_child_of_node(node, child) {
> pr_debug(" * %s\n", child->full_name);
> - if (!of_device_is_available(child))
> - continue;
> reg = of_get_property(child, "reg", ®len);
> if (reg == NULL || reglen < 20)
> continue;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/usb.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/usb.c
> index 3ba4bb7..749c70b 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/usb.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/usb.c
> @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ int mpc837x_usb_cfg(void)
> int ret = 0;
>
> np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "fsl-usb2-dr");
> - if (!np || !of_device_is_available(np))
> + if (!np)
> return -ENODEV;
> prop = of_get_property(np, "phy_type", NULL);
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_mds.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_mds.c
> index aa34cac..5d1a33f 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_mds.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_mds.c
> @@ -170,10 +170,8 @@ static void __init mpc85xx_publish_qe_devices(void)
> struct device_node *np;
>
> np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "fsl,qe");
> - if (!of_device_is_available(np)) {
> - of_node_put(np);
> + if (!np)
> return;
> - }
>
> of_platform_bus_probe(NULL, mpc85xx_qe_ids, NULL);
> }
> @@ -267,11 +265,6 @@ static void __init mpc85xx_mds_qe_init(void)
> return;
> }
>
> - if (!of_device_is_available(np)) {
> - of_node_put(np);
> - return;
> - }
> -
> qe_reset();
> of_node_put(np);
>
> @@ -328,10 +321,8 @@ static void __init mpc85xx_mds_qeic_init(void)
> struct device_node *np;
>
> np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "fsl,qe");
> - if (!of_device_is_available(np)) {
> - of_node_put(np);
> + if (!np)
> return;
> - }
>
> np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "fsl,qe-ic");
> if (!np) {
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c
> index 818f7c6..fba4ec7 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c
> @@ -623,11 +623,6 @@ int __init mpc83xx_add_bridge(struct device_node *dev)
>
> is_mpc83xx_pci = 1;
>
> - if (!of_device_is_available(dev)) {
> - pr_warning("%s: disabled by the firmware.\n",
> - dev->full_name);
> - return -ENODEV;
> - }
> pr_debug("Adding PCI host bridge %s\n", dev->full_name);
>
> /* Fetch host bridge registers address */
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_pci.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_pci.c
> index 156aa7d..cf2adec 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_pci.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_pci.c
> @@ -321,13 +321,6 @@ static void __init ppc4xx_probe_pci_bridge(struct device_node *np)
> const int *bus_range;
> int primary = 0;
>
> - /* Check if device is enabled */
> - if (!of_device_is_available(np)) {
> - printk(KERN_INFO "%s: Port disabled via device-tree\n",
> - np->full_name);
> - return;
> - }
> -
> /* Fetch config space registers address */
> if (of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &rsrc_cfg)) {
> printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Can't get PCI config register base !",
> @@ -1890,14 +1883,6 @@ static void __init ppc4xx_probe_pciex_bridge(struct device_node *np)
> port = &ppc4xx_pciex_ports[portno];
> port->index = portno;
>
> - /*
> - * Check if device is enabled
> - */
> - if (!of_device_is_available(np)) {
> - printk(KERN_INFO "PCIE%d: Port disabled via device-tree\n", port->index);
> - return;
> - }
> -
> port->node = of_node_get(np);
> pval = of_get_property(np, "sdr-base", NULL);
> if (pval == NULL) {
> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
> index 710b53b..5d269a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
> @@ -344,6 +344,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_get_next_child);
> *
> * Returns a node pointer with refcount incremented, use
> * of_node_put() on it when done.
> + *
> + * Does not return nodes marked unavailable by a status property.
> */
> struct device_node *of_find_node_by_path(const char *path)
> {
> @@ -352,6 +354,7 @@ struct device_node *of_find_node_by_path(const char *path)
> read_lock(&devtree_lock);
> for (; np; np = np->allnext) {
> if (np->full_name && (of_node_cmp(np->full_name, path) == 0)
> + && of_device_is_available(np)
> && of_node_get(np))
> break;
> }
> @@ -370,6 +373,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_find_node_by_path);
> *
> * Returns a node pointer with refcount incremented, use
> * of_node_put() on it when done.
> + *
> + * Does not return nodes marked unavailable by a status property.
> */
> struct device_node *of_find_node_by_name(struct device_node *from,
> const char *name)
> @@ -380,6 +385,7 @@ struct device_node *of_find_node_by_name(struct device_node *from,
> np = from ? from->allnext : allnodes;
> for (; np; np = np->allnext)
> if (np->name && (of_node_cmp(np->name, name) == 0)
> + && of_device_is_available(np)
> && of_node_get(np))
> break;
> of_node_put(from);
> @@ -399,6 +405,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_find_node_by_name);
> *
> * Returns a node pointer with refcount incremented, use
> * of_node_put() on it when done.
> + *
> + * Does not return nodes marked unavailable by a status property.
> */
> struct device_node *of_find_node_by_type(struct device_node *from,
> const char *type)
> @@ -409,6 +417,7 @@ struct device_node *of_find_node_by_type(struct device_node *from,
> np = from ? from->allnext : allnodes;
> for (; np; np = np->allnext)
> if (np->type && (of_node_cmp(np->type, type) == 0)
> + && of_device_is_available(np)
> && of_node_get(np))
> break;
> of_node_put(from);
> @@ -430,6 +439,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_find_node_by_type);
> *
> * Returns a node pointer with refcount incremented, use
> * of_node_put() on it when done.
> + *
> + * Does not return nodes marked unavailable by a status property.
> */
> struct device_node *of_find_compatible_node(struct device_node *from,
> const char *type, const char *compatible)
> @@ -442,7 +453,9 @@ struct device_node *of_find_compatible_node(struct device_node *from,
> if (type
> && !(np->type && (of_node_cmp(np->type, type) == 0)))
> continue;
> - if (of_device_is_compatible(np, compatible) && of_node_get(np))
> + if (of_device_is_compatible(np, compatible)
> + && of_device_is_available(np)
> + && of_node_get(np))
> break;
> }
> of_node_put(from);
> @@ -462,6 +475,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_find_compatible_node);
> *
> * Returns a node pointer with refcount incremented, use
> * of_node_put() on it when done.
> + *
> + * Does not return nodes marked unavailable by a status property.
> */
> struct device_node *of_find_node_with_property(struct device_node *from,
> const char *prop_name)
> @@ -472,6 +487,8 @@ struct device_node *of_find_node_with_property(struct device_node *from,
> read_lock(&devtree_lock);
> np = from ? from->allnext : allnodes;
> for (; np; np = np->allnext) {
> + if (!of_device_is_available(np))
> + continue;
> for (pp = np->properties; pp != 0; pp = pp->next) {
> if (of_prop_cmp(pp->name, prop_name) == 0) {
> of_node_get(np);
> @@ -526,6 +543,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_match_node);
> *
> * Returns a node pointer with refcount incremented, use
> * of_node_put() on it when done.
> + *
> + * Does not return nodes marked unavailable by a status property.
> */
> struct device_node *of_find_matching_node(struct device_node *from,
> const struct of_device_id *matches)
> @@ -535,7 +554,9 @@ struct device_node *of_find_matching_node(struct device_node *from,
> read_lock(&devtree_lock);
> np = from ? from->allnext : allnodes;
> for (; np; np = np->allnext) {
> - if (of_match_node(matches, np) && of_node_get(np))
> + if (of_match_node(matches, np)
> + && of_device_is_available(np)
> + && of_node_get(np))
> break;
> }
> of_node_put(from);
> --
> 1.6.3.3
>
> _______________________________________________
> devicetree-discuss mailing list
> devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-12-31 7:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <cover.1291799069.git.deepak_saxena@mentor.com>
2010-12-08 19:29 ` [PATCH 1/5] of/device: Centralize checking of 'status' properties Deepak Saxena
2010-12-31 7:43 ` Grant Likely
2010-12-08 19:29 ` [PATCH 4/5] of/device: Create _of_get_next_child() Deepak Saxena
2010-12-08 19:29 ` [PATCH 5/5] of/device: Show even unavailable nodes in procfs Deepak Saxena
2010-12-08 19:29 ` [PATCH 3/5] of/device: Make of_get_next_child() check status properties Deepak Saxena
2010-12-08 21:01 ` Scott Wood
2010-12-09 1:33 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-12-09 3:09 ` David Gibson
2010-12-15 18:35 ` Hollis Blanchard
2010-12-15 22:40 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-12-31 7:39 ` Grant Likely
2010-12-08 19:29 ` [PATCH 2/5] of/device: make for_each_node* " Deepak Saxena
2010-12-31 7:46 ` Grant Likely
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).