From: Misbah khan <misbah_khan@engineer.com>
To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: Is it safe to use these Linux function (test_bit(), set_bit(), clear_bit()) in character device driver for 2.6.10 ppc kernel.
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 21:28:59 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <12934517.post@talk.nabble.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46FBD483.6090403@freescale.com>
Scott Wood-2 wrote:
>
> Misbah khan wrote:
>> Hi all I am using "test_bit(),set_bit(),clear_bit() etc" API functions
>> provided by the Linux kernel. I want to know that if anybody is used it
>> and have full faith in its operation then please let me know. Driver in
>> the while loop is calling these API's hence i want to make sure that its
>> operation will remain stable.
>
> They're used all over the place. Is there anything about them that you
> find suspect?
>
> -Scott
>
> I have devloped a character driver for FPGA which is memory mapped and
> using these API's to test a bit , set a bit or to clear a bit in the
> memory for eg :-
>
> /* poll till data is transfered from sdram to dpram */
> while((test_bit(DFR_BUSY,(UINT32 *)(\
> (void *)mmap_reg_ptr + DATA_STATUS_REG))==1)\
> && (delay < MAX_DELAY_BUSY))
> {
> KDEBUG3(" In the Dfr delay loop \n");
> mdelay(DELAY);
> delay+=DELAY;
> }/* End of while(test_bit(FPGA_BUSY,(void *)register name) */
>
> if(delay==MAX_DELAY_BUSY)
> {
> KDEBUG1("Out of the the Dfr busy loop \n");
> return -1;
> }
>
> People working for FPGA are sure that they are not making the bit high
> where in my driver is returning -1 from the kernel space aborting it after
> running for few minutes or so . Please let me know that This function is
> stable and i should tell them that the driver is stable in its operation
> and they should check it from there side.
>
> Misbah
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
> Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-safe-to-use-these-Linux-function-%28test_bit%28%29%2Cset_bit%28%29%2Cclear_bit%28%29%29-in-character-device-driver-for-2.6.10-ppc-kernel.-tf4527008.html#a12934517
Sent from the linuxppc-embedded mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-28 4:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-27 8:12 Is it safe to use these Linux function (test_bit(), set_bit(), clear_bit()) in character device driver for 2.6.10 ppc kernel Misbah khan
2007-09-27 16:04 ` Scott Wood
2007-09-28 4:28 ` Misbah khan [this message]
2007-09-28 5:19 ` Jeff Mock
2007-09-28 9:12 ` Misbah khan
2007-09-30 14:54 ` Misbah khan
2007-10-01 4:25 ` Olof Johansson
2007-10-01 5:38 ` Misbah khan
2007-10-01 13:55 ` Olof Johansson
2007-10-04 13:02 ` Misbah khan
2007-10-04 16:42 ` Grant Likely
2007-09-28 16:09 ` Scott Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=12934517.post@talk.nabble.com \
--to=misbah_khan@engineer.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).