From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [85.118.1.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53156B6FA5 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:01:31 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: [BUG] rebuild_sched_domains considered dangerous From: Peter Zijlstra To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt In-Reply-To: <1299665998.2308.2753.camel@twins> References: <1299639487.22236.256.camel@pasglop> <1299665998.2308.2753.camel@twins> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 14:01:14 +0100 Message-ID: <1299675674.2308.2924.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Martin Schwidefsky , linuxppc-dev , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Jesse Larrew List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 11:19 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > No, the domain stuff is good, we allocate new domains and have a > synchronize_sched() between us installing the new ones and freeing the > old ones.=20 Gah, if only..