From: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/18] powerpc/smp: Increase vdso_data->processorCount, not just decrease it
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:41:07 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1299728467.6272.49.camel@concordia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1299566250-10516-18-git-send-email-benh@kernel.crashing.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1032 bytes --]
On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 17:37 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 4 ++++
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> index e337073..6023395 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -551,6 +551,10 @@ void __devinit start_secondary(void *unused)
>
> secondary_cpu_time_init();
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> + if (system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING)
> + vdso_data->processorCount++;
> +#endif
So the SYSTEM_RUNNING check is to avoid clashing with the logic in
smp_setup_cpu_maps() I presume:
arch/powerpc/kernel/setup-common.c: vdso_data->processorCount = num_present_cpus();
But why not remove that, and let the increment in start_secondary() do
all the work?
With the current code if a cpu is present but fails to come up the count
will be wrong I think.
cheers
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-10 3:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-08 6:37 [PATCHES] powerpc: Cleanup and fix CPU hotplug Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-03-08 6:37 ` [PATCH 01/18] powerpc: Make decrementer interrupt robust against offlined CPUs Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-03-10 8:01 ` Michael Ellerman
2011-03-08 6:37 ` [PATCH 02/18] powerpc/smp: soft-replugged CPUs must go back to start_secondary Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-03-08 6:37 ` [PATCH 03/18] powerpc/smp: Fix generic_mach_cpu_die() Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-03-08 6:37 ` [PATCH 04/18] powerpc/smp: Remove unused generic_cpu_enable() Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-03-08 6:37 ` [PATCH 05/18] powerpc/smp: Remove unused smp_ops->cpu_enable() Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-03-08 6:37 ` [PATCH 06/18] powerpc/pmac/smp: Fix 32-bit PowerMac cpu_die Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-03-08 6:37 ` [PATCH 07/18] powerpc/pmac/smp: Rename fixup_irqs() to migrate_irqs() and use it on ppc32 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-03-08 6:37 ` [PATCH 08/18] powerpc/pmac/smp: Fixup smp_core99_cpu_disable() and use it on 64-bit Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-03-08 6:37 ` [PATCH 09/18] powerpc/pmac/smp: Consolidate 32-bit and 64-bit PowerMac cpu_die in one file Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-03-08 6:37 ` [PATCH 10/18] powerpc/pmac/smp: Remove HMT changes for PowerMac offline code Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-03-08 6:37 ` [PATCH 11/18] powerpc/pmac/smp: Properly NAP offlined CPU on G5 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-03-08 6:37 ` [PATCH 12/18] powerpc/pmac: Rename cpu_state in therm_pm72 to avoid collision Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-03-08 6:37 ` [PATCH 13/18] powerpc/smp: Add a smp_ops->bringup_up() done callback Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-03-08 6:37 ` [PATCH 14/18] powerpc/pmac/smp: Fix CPU hotplug crashes on some machines Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-03-08 6:37 ` [PATCH 15/18] powerpc/smp: Don't expose per-cpu "cpu_state" array Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-03-29 5:37 ` Michael Ellerman
2011-03-29 8:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-03-08 6:37 ` [PATCH 16/18] powerpc/smp: Create idle threads on demand and properly reset them Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-03-08 6:37 ` [PATCH 17/18] powerpc/smp: Increase vdso_data->processorCount, not just decrease it Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-03-10 3:41 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2011-03-10 3:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-03-08 6:37 ` [PATCH 18/18] powerpc/pmac/smp: Remove no-longer needed preempt workaround Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1299728467.6272.49.camel@concordia \
--to=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).