From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2481CB6F15 for ; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 08:04:54 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] powerpc: Use MSR_64BIT in places From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Kumar Gala In-Reply-To: References: <431bd20fec52ff41fb47808954993ab6369eb45e.1302249358.git.michael@ellerman.id.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 08:04:41 +1000 Message-ID: <1302386681.28876.0.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 04:24 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > On Apr 8, 2011, at 2:56 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > > Use the new MSR_64BIT in a few places. Some of these are already ifdef'ed > > for BOOKE vs BOOKS, but it's still clearer, MSR_SF does not immediately > > parse as "MSR bit for 64bit". > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman > > --- > > arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.S | 2 +- > > arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c | 4 ++-- > > arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c | 2 +- > > arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c | 14 +++++++------- > > 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > However MSR_ISF does ;) I'm not sure I parse that one :-) Any ways ISF is "interrupt SF" and has no equivalent in the MSR for BookE (it's elsewhere, EPCR no ?). Cheers, Ben.