From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 230B3B71BC for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 15:38:57 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the powerpc tree From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Stephen Rothwell In-Reply-To: <20110520141425.dd38cb7d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20110520141425.dd38cb7d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 15:38:24 +1000 Message-ID: <1305869904.7481.145.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Milton Miller , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Ingo Molnar List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 14:14 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in > arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c between commit 23d72bfd8f9f ("powerpc: > Consolidate ipi message mux and demux") from the powerpc tree and commit > 184748cc50b2 ("sched: Provide scheduler_ipi() callback in response to > smp_send_reschedule()") from the tip tree. > > The former superceded part of the latter's changes, so I just used the > former for that. I've done the merge and resolved the conflict properly (it's actually non trivial due to some other changes) in the powerpc tree, I'll send a pull request to Linus later today. Cheers, Ben.