From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC143B6FDD for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 08:43:34 +1000 (EST) Subject: RE: powerpc: Add printk companion for ppc_md.progress From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Dave Carroll In-Reply-To: <522F24EF533FC546962ECFA2054FF777373072AB9B@MAILSERVER2.cos.astekcorp.com> References: <522F24EF533FC546962ECFA2054FF777373072AB9B@MAILSERVER2.cos.astekcorp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 08:43:04 +1000 Message-ID: <1308350584.32158.58.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev , "dtcarroll@gmail.com" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 10:03 -0600, Dave Carroll wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 15:39 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > > Hrm.. none of your 2 pending patches applies cleanly (factoring > > free_initmem & that one). Haven't had a chance to check why yet, can you > > check on your side ? > > > Hi Ben, > > I rebased with Linus' current tree, and the patches are identical. Is there another tree > that I should use to get the patches clean? Maybe they got corrupted by your mailer ? I will double check on monday. Cheers, Ben.