From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [openmcapi-dev] Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] powerpc: add support for MPIC message register API From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Meador Inge In-Reply-To: <4E0BE7B4.1020901@mentor.com> References: <1306869543-18812-1-git-send-email-meador_inge@mentor.com> <1306869543-18812-3-git-send-email-meador_inge@mentor.com> <1308288784.32158.30.camel@pasglop> <4E0BE7B4.1020901@mentor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:19:08 +1000 Message-ID: <1309407548.14501.202.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openmcapi-dev@googlegroups.com, Hollis Blanchard , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 22:04 -0500, Meador Inge wrote: > I posted a more detailed response a few days back: > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/98075/. In > that response, I tried to put forth the rationale > for allocating the registers statically due to > the AMP use case. With that in mind, do you > still disagree with the design? If so, do > you have any suggestions for how it could be > better? No, not really, please repost with my other comments addressed. Cheers, Ben.