From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AFE2B6F5B for ; Sat, 2 Jul 2011 09:11:32 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: Move definition of MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE to a header From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Ingo Molnar In-Reply-To: <20110701121408.GC28008@elte.hu> References: <1308013070.2874.784.camel@pasglop> <20110701121408.GC28008@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 09:11:06 +1000 Message-ID: <1309561866.14501.254.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Thomas Gleixner , linuxppc-dev , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 14:14 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > The macro MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE is currently defined twice in two .c > > files, and I need it in a third one to fix a powerpc bug, so let's > > first move it into a header > > > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt > > --- > > > > Ingo, Thomas: Who needs to ack the x86 bit ? I'd like to send that > > to Linus asap with the powerpc fix. > > Acked-by: Ingo Molnar > > (btw., you can consider obvious cleanups as being implicitly acked by > me and don't need to block fixes on me.) Ok thanks ! Cheers, Ben.