From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-iw0-f179.google.com (mail-iw0-f179.google.com [209.85.214.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDC1F1007DC for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 09:14:56 +1000 (EST) Received: by iwg8 with SMTP id 8so2492369iwg.38 for ; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 16:14:54 -0700 (PDT) From: "Matthew L. Creech" To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH v3] mtd: eLBC NAND: remove elbc_fcm_ctrl->oob_poi Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 19:14:48 -0400 Message-Id: <1309907688-8235-1-git-send-email-mlcreech@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1309905302-1990-1-git-send-email-mlcreech@gmail.com> References: <1309905302-1990-1-git-send-email-mlcreech@gmail.com> Cc: scottwood@freescale.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, rick22@wi.rr.com, mhench@elutions.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Mike Hench The eLBC NAND driver currently follows up each program/write operation with a read-back of the page, in order to [ostensibly] fill in ECC data for the caller. However, the page address used for this read is always -1, so the read will never work correctly. Remove this useless (and potentially problematic) block of code. v2: elbc_fcm_ctrl->oob_poi is removed entirely, since this code block was the only place it was actually used. v3: local 'full_page' variable is no longer used either. Signed-off-by: Matthew L. Creech --- drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c | 33 ++------------------------------- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c index 0bb254c..b4d310f 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c @@ -75,7 +75,6 @@ struct fsl_elbc_fcm_ctrl { unsigned int use_mdr; /* Non zero if the MDR is to be set */ unsigned int oob; /* Non zero if operating on OOB data */ unsigned int counter; /* counter for the initializations */ - char *oob_poi; /* Place to write ECC after read back */ }; /* These map to the positions used by the FCM hardware ECC generator */ @@ -435,7 +434,6 @@ static void fsl_elbc_cmdfunc(struct mtd_info *mtd, unsigned int command, /* PAGEPROG reuses all of the setup from SEQIN and adds the length */ case NAND_CMD_PAGEPROG: { - int full_page; dev_vdbg(priv->dev, "fsl_elbc_cmdfunc: NAND_CMD_PAGEPROG " "writing %d bytes.\n", elbc_fcm_ctrl->index); @@ -445,34 +443,12 @@ static void fsl_elbc_cmdfunc(struct mtd_info *mtd, unsigned int command, * write so the HW generates the ECC. */ if (elbc_fcm_ctrl->oob || elbc_fcm_ctrl->column != 0 || - elbc_fcm_ctrl->index != mtd->writesize + mtd->oobsize) { + elbc_fcm_ctrl->index != mtd->writesize + mtd->oobsize) out_be32(&lbc->fbcr, elbc_fcm_ctrl->index); - full_page = 0; - } else { + else out_be32(&lbc->fbcr, 0); - full_page = 1; - } fsl_elbc_run_command(mtd); - - /* Read back the page in order to fill in the ECC for the - * caller. Is this really needed? - */ - if (full_page && elbc_fcm_ctrl->oob_poi) { - out_be32(&lbc->fbcr, 3); - set_addr(mtd, 6, page_addr, 1); - - elbc_fcm_ctrl->read_bytes = mtd->writesize + 9; - - fsl_elbc_do_read(chip, 1); - fsl_elbc_run_command(mtd); - - memcpy_fromio(elbc_fcm_ctrl->oob_poi + 6, - &elbc_fcm_ctrl->addr[elbc_fcm_ctrl->index], 3); - elbc_fcm_ctrl->index += 3; - } - - elbc_fcm_ctrl->oob_poi = NULL; return; } @@ -752,13 +728,8 @@ static void fsl_elbc_write_page(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip, const uint8_t *buf) { - struct fsl_elbc_mtd *priv = chip->priv; - struct fsl_elbc_fcm_ctrl *elbc_fcm_ctrl = priv->ctrl->nand; - fsl_elbc_write_buf(mtd, buf, mtd->writesize); fsl_elbc_write_buf(mtd, chip->oob_poi, mtd->oobsize); - - elbc_fcm_ctrl->oob_poi = chip->oob_poi; } static int fsl_elbc_chip_init(struct fsl_elbc_mtd *priv) -- 1.6.3.3