From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
anton@samba.org
Subject: Re: [regression] 3.0-rc boot failure -- bisected to cd4ea6ae3982
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 14:28:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1310041707.3282.569.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110707115531.GA21737@in.ibm.com>
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 17:25 +0530, Mahesh J Salgaonkar wrote:
> > I guess I'm asking is, do smaller P7 machines boot? And if so, is there
> > any difference except size?
>=20
> Yes, the smaller P7 machine that I have with 20 CPUs and 2GB ram boots
> fine with 3.0.0-rc.=20
That sounds like a single node machine. P7 comes as {4,6,8}*4 (16,24,32
cpus) per socket. And that 2G doesn't sound like much either.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-07 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-07 10:22 [regression] 3.0-rc boot failure -- bisected to cd4ea6ae3982 Mahesh J Salgaonkar
2011-07-07 10:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-07 11:55 ` Mahesh J Salgaonkar
2011-07-07 12:28 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-07-14 0:34 ` Anton Blanchard
2011-07-14 4:35 ` Anton Blanchard
2011-07-14 13:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-15 0:45 ` Anton Blanchard
2011-07-15 8:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-18 21:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-19 4:44 ` Anton Blanchard
2011-07-19 10:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-20 2:03 ` Anton Blanchard
2011-07-20 10:14 ` Anton Blanchard
2011-07-20 10:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-20 12:14 ` Anton Blanchard
2011-07-20 14:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-20 14:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-20 16:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-20 16:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-20 16:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1310041707.3282.569.camel@twins \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).