From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Shan Hai <haishan.bai@gmail.com>
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cmetcalf@tilera.com, dhowells@redhat.com, paulus@samba.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, walken@google.com,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Fixup write permission of TLB on powerpc e500 core
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 11:50:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1310723441.2586.291.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E20037C.5070506@gmail.com>
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 17:08 +0800, Shan Hai wrote:
> The whole scenario should be,
> - the child process triggers a page fault at the first time access to
> the lock, and it got its own writable page, but its *clean* for
> the reason just for checking the status of the lock.
> I am sorry for above "unbreakable COW".
> - the futex_lock_pi() is invoked because of the lock contention,
> and the futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() tries to get the lock,
> it found out the lock is free so tries to write to the lock for
> reservation, a page fault occurs, because the page is read only
> for kernel(e500 specific), and returns -EFAULT to the caller
> - the fault_in_user_writeable() tries to fix the fault,
> but from the get_user_pages() view everything is ok, because
> the COW was already broken, retry futex_lock_pi_atomic()
but that's a bug right there, gup(.write=3D1) _should_ be a complete write
fault, and as such toggle your sw dirty/young tracking.
> - futex_lock_pi_atomic() --> futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic(),
> another write protection page fault
> - infinite loop
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-15 9:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-15 8:07 [PATCH 0/1] Fixup write permission of TLB on powerpc e500 core Shan Hai
2011-07-15 8:07 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Shan Hai
2011-07-15 10:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-15 15:18 ` Shan Hai
2011-07-15 15:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-16 15:36 ` Shan Hai
2011-07-16 14:50 ` Shan Hai
2011-07-16 23:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-17 9:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-17 14:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-17 23:14 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-18 3:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-18 4:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-18 4:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-18 6:48 ` Shan Hai
2011-07-18 7:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-18 7:26 ` Shan Hai
2011-07-18 7:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-18 7:50 ` Shan Hai
2011-07-19 3:30 ` Shan Hai
2011-07-19 4:20 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-19 4:29 ` [RFC/PATCH] mm/futex: Fix futex writes on archs with SW tracking of dirty & young Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-19 4:55 ` Shan Hai
2011-07-19 5:17 ` Shan Hai
2011-07-19 5:24 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-19 5:38 ` Shan Hai
2011-07-19 7:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-19 8:24 ` Shan Hai
2011-07-19 8:26 ` [RFC/PATCH] mm/futex: Fix futex writes on archs with SW trackingof " David Laight
2011-07-19 8:45 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-19 8:45 ` Shan Hai
2011-07-19 11:10 ` [RFC/PATCH] mm/futex: Fix futex writes on archs with SW tracking of " Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-20 14:39 ` Darren Hart
2011-07-21 22:36 ` Andrew Morton
2011-07-21 22:52 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-21 22:57 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-21 22:59 ` Andrew Morton
2011-07-22 1:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-22 1:54 ` Shan Hai
2011-07-27 6:50 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-07-27 7:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-27 8:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-27 10:09 ` David Howells
2011-07-27 10:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-27 10:20 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-28 0:12 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-08-08 2:31 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-07-28 10:55 ` David Howells
2011-07-17 11:02 ` [PATCH 1/1] Fixup write permission of TLB on powerpc e500 core Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-17 13:33 ` Shan Hai
2011-07-17 14:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-17 15:40 ` Shan Hai
2011-07-17 22:34 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-17 14:34 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-15 8:20 ` [PATCH 0/1] " Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-15 8:38 ` MailingLists
2011-07-15 8:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-15 9:08 ` Shan Hai
2011-07-15 9:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-15 9:50 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-07-15 10:06 ` Shan Hai
2011-07-15 10:32 ` David Laight
2011-07-15 10:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-15 15:32 ` Shan Hai
2011-07-16 0:20 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-16 15:03 ` Shan Hai
2011-07-15 23:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-15 9:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-15 9:05 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1310723441.2586.291.camel@twins \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=haishan.bai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=walken@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).