From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:4978:20e::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5641BB6F83 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 22:42:00 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ppc64 scheduler fixes From: Peter Zijlstra To: Anton Blanchard In-Reply-To: <20110725023311.175792493@samba.org> References: <20110725023311.175792493@samba.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:41:42 +0200 Message-ID: <1311597702.24752.1.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: mingo@elte.hu, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 12:33 +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote: > Here are a set of ppc64 scheduler fixes that help with some > multi node performance issues. They look fine to me. I'll probably ping you when I'll rip out all that SD_NODES_PER_DOMAIN crap for good, but until then I'm fine with you fiddling it for ppc64. Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra