From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B36B7B6F62 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 17:59:52 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] mm/futex: Fix futex writes on archs with SW tracking of dirty & young From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Mike Frysinger In-Reply-To: References: <1310717238-13857-1-git-send-email-haishan.bai@gmail.com> <1310717238-13857-2-git-send-email-haishan.bai@gmail.com> <1310725418.2586.309.camel@twins> <4E21A526.8010904@gmail.com> <1310860194.25044.17.camel@pasglop> <4b337921-d430-4b63-bc36-ad31753cf800@email.android.com> <1310912990.25044.203.camel@pasglop> <1310944453.25044.262.camel@pasglop> <1310961691.25044.274.camel@pasglop> <4E23D728.7090406@gmail.com> <1310972462.25044.292.camel@pasglop> <4E23E02C.8090401@gmail.com> <1310974591.25044.298.camel@pasglop> <4E24FA51.70602@gmail.com> <1311049762.25044.392.camel@pasglop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 17:58:33 +1000 Message-ID: <1311753513.25044.663.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, Peter Zijlstra , Shan Hai , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cmetcalf@tilera.com, dhowells@redhat.com, paulus@samba.org, uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org, tglx@linutronix.de, walken@google.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 23:50 -0700, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 21:29, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > The futex code currently attempts to write to user memory within > > a pagefault disabled section, and if that fails, tries to fix it > > up using get_user_pages(). > > > > This doesn't work on archs where the dirty and young bits are > > maintained by software, since they will gate access permission > > in the TLB, and will not be updated by gup(). > > > > In addition, there's an expectation on some archs that a > > spurious write fault triggers a local TLB flush, and that is > > missing from the picture as well. > > > > I decided that adding those "features" to gup() would be too much > > for this already too complex function, and instead added a new > > simpler fixup_user_fault() which is essentially a wrapper around > > handle_mm_fault() which the futex code can call. > > unfortunately, this breaks all nommu ports. you added > fixup_user_fault() to mm/memory.c only which is not used by nommu Argh. Andrew, do you want to send a fix ? I won't be able to do that tonight, I have to go. What should nommu do anyways ? it's not like there's much it can do right ? It should never even hit the fault path to start with ... Cheers, Ben.