From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.sgi.com [192.48.179.30]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F4EAB6F8B for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 22:28:41 +1000 (EST) From: Robin Holt To: Robin Holt , Marc Kleine-Budde , Wolfgang Grandegger , U Bhaskar-B22300 Subject: [Patch 0/4] [flexcan/powerpc] Add support for powerpc flexcan (freescale p1010) -V8 Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 07:28:23 -0500 Message-Id: <1312892907-20419-1-git-send-email-holt@sgi.com> Cc: socketcan-core@lists.berlios.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org, PPC list , Robin Holt List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Marc, Wolfgang or U Bhaskar, This patch set should have all your comments included. It is based on the David S. Miller net-next-2.6 tree commit 19fd617. I have compiled each patch in the series individually for both arm and powerpc (cheated on ppc and reordered them with the last patch first so I could select CAN_FLEXCAN. With all the patches applied, my p1010rdb works for communicating between its two can ports and also can communicate with an external PSOC. I have done no testing beyond compile testing on an arm system as I have no access to an arm based system. For the first three patches in the series, I believe they are all ready for submission to David S. Miller for the netdev tree. This is the first submission of patch 4 which, I believe, will end up going through the linuxppc-dev list and can go at any time after the flexcan patches are submitted. As long the first and last patches are both applied, the tree will compile for either ppc or arm, but will not work without all patches. If the ppc patch (4/4) gets applied before 1/4, we could have a random config tester detect a compile failure on ppc if they select NET, CAN, and CAN_FLEXCAN. Thanks, Robin Holt