linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: "tiejun.chen" <tiejun.chen@windriver.com>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
	"linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [v3 PATCH 1/1] booke/kprobe: make program exception to use one dedicated exception stack
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 07:32:59 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1314826379.2488.151.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E5DFC41.7030606@windriver.com>

On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 17:17 +0800, tiejun.chen wrote:

> > It sounds hackish but it makes it easier to fix everybody at once, there
> > are "issues" with changing stacks especially on ppc64 and it would
> > definitely be affected as well if the stack frame created is larger than
> > our gap.
> 
> If we provide another exception stack like we did debug exception on ppc64, are
> there those "issues" you said?

Actually if we allocate it like the irq stacks, we should be ok, but
that's yet another 16K per CPU that needs to be covered by the first
segment, nasty....

In any case, please try to come up with a patch that covers all
variants.

Cheers,
Ben.
 

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-31 21:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-11 11:31 [v3 PATCH 1/1] booke/kprobe: make program exception to use one dedicated exception stack Tiejun Chen
2011-07-11 11:31 ` [v3] booke/kprobe: Fix stack corrupt issue when kprobe 'stwu' Tiejun Chen
2011-07-14 11:56   ` tiejun.chen
2011-07-12  2:35 ` [v3 PATCH 1/1] booke/kprobe: make program exception to use one dedicated exception stack tiejun.chen
2011-07-14 13:27 ` Kumar Gala
2011-07-14 15:53   ` Scott Wood
2011-07-15  5:28   ` tiejun.chen
2011-07-15 18:42     ` Scott Wood
2011-07-16  3:25       ` Chen, Tiejun
2011-07-18 15:56         ` Scott Wood
2011-07-19 10:52           ` tiejun.chen
2011-08-30  5:44             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-08-31  9:17               ` tiejun.chen
2011-08-31 21:32                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2011-07-21  9:32     ` tiejun.chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1314826379.2488.151.camel@pasglop \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
    --cc=tiejun.chen@windriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).