From: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Suzuki Poulose <suzuki@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux ppc dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: Defintion of kernstart_addr
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 09:51:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1317833518.7842.92.camel@nimitz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E8C525F.4090000@in.ibm.com>
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 18:19 +0530, Suzuki Poulose wrote:
> #define __va(x) ((void *)(unsigned long)((phys_addr_t)(x) -
> PHYSICAL_START + KERNELBASE)
>
> where,
> PHYSICAL_START is #define'd to kernstart_addr variable, updated at boot
Where kernstart_addr is the physical address of where we loaded the
kernel. But, this has the side-effect of also shifting the kernel's
identity mapping (the 1:1 virtual-to-physical map) up by that amount.
I'm unconvinced that this movement of the identity mapping is necessary.
Even if it is, Suzuki mentions:
> #define __va(x) ((void *)(unsigned long)((phys_addr_t)(x) -
> PHYSICAL_START + KERNELBASE)
> where:
> PHYSICAL_START is kernstart_addr - a variable updated at runtime.
> KERNELBASE is the compile time Virtual base address of kernel.
>
> This won't work for us, as the kernstart_addr may change at runtime, even
> though the mapping doesn't change.
That seems to tell me that PHYSICAL_START and kernstart_addr shouldn't
be the same variable. We should break them apart so that we can move
the kernel's starting physical address without changing the virt/phys
mapping.
Which, I'm fearing, was what Suzuki's first patch did, and I failed to
grok it.
-- Dave
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-05 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-05 12:49 Defintion of kernstart_addr Suzuki Poulose
2011-10-05 16:51 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1317833518.7842.92.camel@nimitz \
--to=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=suzuki@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).