From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD1C31007D2 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:14:44 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <1322000067.14573.12.camel@pasglop> Subject: Re: curious why mpc85xx/edac/pcie patch series was never picked up From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Chris Friesen Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:14:27 +1100 In-Reply-To: <4ECBDE98.8090705@genband.com> References: <4ECBDE98.8090705@genband.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: b25806@freescale.com, Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 11:40 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: > We're doing some work with an mpc85xx-based board and someone pointed to > a patch adding PCI/PCIE error interrupt edac support that was proposed > by Lan Chunhe over a year ago: > > http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2010-November/086930.html > > For some reason this doesn't appear to have been picked up for mainline, > and I'm curious why not--is there something wrong with it? Kumar ? What's up there ? Is that a miscommunication with the edac folks or we just lost it between the cracks ? Cheers, Ben.