linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] sbc834x: put full compat string in board match check
@ 2011-12-05 16:41 Paul Gortmaker
  2011-12-08  7:23 ` Kumar Gala
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Paul Gortmaker @ 2011-12-05 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: galak; +Cc: linuxppc-dev

The commit 883c2cfc8bcc0fd00c5d9f596fb8870f481b5bda:

 "fix of_flat_dt_is_compatible() to match the full compatible string"

causes silent boot death on the sbc8349 board because it was
just looking for 8349 and not 8349E -- as originally there
were non-E (no SEC/encryption) chips available.  Just add the
E to the board detection string since all boards I've seen
were manufactured with the E versions.

Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/sbc834x.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/sbc834x.c
index af41d8c..f5a783a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/sbc834x.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/sbc834x.c
@@ -102,11 +102,11 @@ static int __init sbc834x_probe(void)
 {
 	unsigned long root = of_get_flat_dt_root();
 
-	return of_flat_dt_is_compatible(root, "SBC834x");
+	return of_flat_dt_is_compatible(root, "SBC834xE");
 }
 
 define_machine(sbc834x) {
-	.name			= "SBC834x",
+	.name			= "SBC834xE",
 	.probe			= sbc834x_probe,
 	.setup_arch		= sbc834x_setup_arch,
 	.init_IRQ		= sbc834x_init_IRQ,
-- 
1.7.7

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] sbc834x: put full compat string in board match check
  2011-12-05 16:41 [PATCH] sbc834x: put full compat string in board match check Paul Gortmaker
@ 2011-12-08  7:23 ` Kumar Gala
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Gala @ 2011-12-08  7:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Gortmaker; +Cc: linuxppc-dev


On Dec 5, 2011, at 10:41 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:

> The commit 883c2cfc8bcc0fd00c5d9f596fb8870f481b5bda:
> 
> "fix of_flat_dt_is_compatible() to match the full compatible string"
> 
> causes silent boot death on the sbc8349 board because it was
> just looking for 8349 and not 8349E -- as originally there
> were non-E (no SEC/encryption) chips available.  Just add the
> E to the board detection string since all boards I've seen
> were manufactured with the E versions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>

applied to merge

- k

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-12-08  7:23 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-12-05 16:41 [PATCH] sbc834x: put full compat string in board match check Paul Gortmaker
2011-12-08  7:23 ` Kumar Gala

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).