From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76B781007DA for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 09:01:51 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <1323295271.12793.1.camel@pasglop> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 4/4] powerpc: tqm8548/tqm8xx: add and update CAN device nodes From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Wolfgang Grandegger Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 09:01:11 +1100 In-Reply-To: <4EDF22DF.5020001@grandegger.com> References: <1322732481-2255-1-git-send-email-wg@grandegger.com> <1322732481-2255-5-git-send-email-wg@grandegger.com> <1323243268.660.71.camel@pasglop> <4EDF22DF.5020001@grandegger.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, socketcan-users@lists.berlios.de, linux-can@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 09:25 +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > > Also there have been at least 3 versions in a couple of days already > > without comments nor indication of what was changed... > > Unfortunately, no response from those sub-system guys. > > > Can you clarify things a bit please ? It looks like they really should > > go to linuxppc-dev (and you can probably drop a bunch of other lists) or > > am I missing an important piece of the puzzle ? (Such as patch 1/4 and > > 2/4 ...) > > I have not sent the whole series. The changes are documented in the > cover-letter, which I have not sent for those patches. Well, I think > it's better to sent the whole series to all parties instead? Well at least for linuxppc-dev, don't bother now that I know what this is about :-) > > Let me know if I should just remove them from powerpc patchwork. > > Dave has already applied all patches. > > Sorry for the confusion. Any advice on how to handle multi subsystem > series of patches properly is welcome. No specific advice. Ideally, if patchwork could track cover letters it would help but I don't see a non-nasty way to do it so ... :-) Cheers, Ben.