From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 942C51007D6 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 15:42:02 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <1323405702.19891.7.camel@pasglop> Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the 4xx tree with the powerpc tree From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Josh Boyer Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 15:41:42 +1100 In-Reply-To: References: <20111209123811.12cf28971f21a309976f31bb@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , Tanmay Inamdar , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 20:46 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Josh, > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the 4xx tree got a conflict in > > arch/powerpc/platforms/40x/ppc40x_simple.c between commit 11eab297f57b > > ("powerpc: Add support for OpenBlockS 600") from the powerpc tree and > > commit d5b9ee7b514e ("powerpc/40x: Add APM8018X SOC support") from the > > 4xx tree. > > I blame BenH. I sent him a pull request with d5b9ee7b514e in it > before he went and updated his tree. Still not pulled afaik. Guess > I'll be rebasing my next branch tomorrow to pick up a series from Tony > Breeds, unless Ben handles the outstanding pull before I wake up :). Don't bother rebasing, I can deal with a minor merge conflict like that :-) > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. > > Looks correct to me. Hopefully you won't have to carry it long. > > > > [Josh: I have changed you contact address to the above] Cheers, Ben.