linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Fushen Chen <fchen@apm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Linuxppc-dev Development <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: CONFIG_NO_HZ added too much idle time in /proc/stat during throughput test.
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:34:06 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1323819246.7671.4.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1112140027230.3020@ionos>

On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 00:28 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 12:42 -0800, Fushen Chen wrote:
> > > On APM82181,  "vmstat" (/proc/stat)  doesn't show correct idle
> > > percent, if kernel enables "CONFIG_NO_HZ" (Tickless System / Dynamic
> > > Tick).
> > > 
> > > When I run wireless throughput test with heavy traffic, "vmstat" shows
> > > very high idle percent while "oprofile" shows very low idle percent.
> > > During the test, the system is idle, but network traffic uses a lot of
> > > hard IRQ and soft-irq time. "vmstat" would have the correct stats if
> > > account_idle_ticks(ticks) in kernel/time/tick-sched.c doesn't add more
> > > idle time in "vmstat". In the same test, if I disable "CONFIG_NO_HZ"
> > > in kernel, idle percent in "vmstat" and "oprofile" would match.
> > > 
> > > My APM82181 kernel configuration is "CONFIG_NO_HZ", "CONFIG_HZ_250=y",
> > > "CONFIG_HZ=250", and "CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS".
> > > 
> > > My question is that if kernel enables "CONFIG_NO_HZ", how would kernel
> > > report correct stats.
> > 
> > Hi Thomas ! Any idea what we're doing wrong ? :-)
> 
> Not really, that had been an issue before and had been fixed. Peter ????

Fusen, what kernel version is this ?

Cheers,
Ben.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-13 23:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-13 20:42 CONFIG_NO_HZ added too much idle time in /proc/stat during throughput test Fushen Chen
2011-12-13 23:24 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-12-13 23:28   ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-12-13 23:34     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2011-12-14  1:14       ` Fushen Chen
2011-12-14  3:17         ` Anton Blanchard
     [not found] <CAEu=RPirE=H1N=KjHNjNRBM6H1fRvrugCw6ojqWaTNm2=WTfng__4707.66240400753$1323813396$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com>
2011-12-13 23:57 ` Andreas Schwab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1323819246.7671.4.camel@pasglop \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=fchen@apm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).