From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A83D61007D3 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:34:24 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <1323819246.7671.4.camel@pasglop> Subject: Re: CONFIG_NO_HZ added too much idle time in /proc/stat during throughput test. From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Fushen Chen Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:34:06 +1100 In-Reply-To: References: <1323818650.7671.3.camel@pasglop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Linuxppc-dev Development , Thomas Gleixner List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 00:28 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 12:42 -0800, Fushen Chen wrote: > > > On APM82181, "vmstat" (/proc/stat) doesn't show correct idle > > > percent, if kernel enables "CONFIG_NO_HZ" (Tickless System / Dynamic > > > Tick). > > > > > > When I run wireless throughput test with heavy traffic, "vmstat" shows > > > very high idle percent while "oprofile" shows very low idle percent. > > > During the test, the system is idle, but network traffic uses a lot of > > > hard IRQ and soft-irq time. "vmstat" would have the correct stats if > > > account_idle_ticks(ticks) in kernel/time/tick-sched.c doesn't add more > > > idle time in "vmstat". In the same test, if I disable "CONFIG_NO_HZ" > > > in kernel, idle percent in "vmstat" and "oprofile" would match. > > > > > > My APM82181 kernel configuration is "CONFIG_NO_HZ", "CONFIG_HZ_250=y", > > > "CONFIG_HZ=250", and "CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS". > > > > > > My question is that if kernel enables "CONFIG_NO_HZ", how would kernel > > > report correct stats. > > > > Hi Thomas ! Any idea what we're doing wrong ? :-) > > Not really, that had been an issue before and had been fixed. Peter ???? Fusen, what kernel version is this ? Cheers, Ben.