From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB23E1007D4 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:35:51 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <1324006543.4875.1.camel@pasglop> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc/setup_{32, 64}.c: remove unneeded boot_cpuid{, _phys} From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: McClintock Matthew-B29882 Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:35:43 +1100 In-Reply-To: References: <1322192477.32635.15.camel@pasglop> <1322540669-6834-1-git-send-email-msm@freescale.com> <1324005174.4875.0.camel@pasglop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Gala Kumar-B11780 , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 03:29 +0000, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt > wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 22:24 -0600, Matthew McClintock wrote: > >> boot_cpuid and init_thread_info.cpu are redundant, just use the > >> var that stays around longer and add a define to make boot_cpuid > >> point at the correct value > >> > >> boot_cpudid_phys is not needed and can completly go away from the > >> SMP case, we leave it there for the non-SMP case since the paca > >> struct is not around to store this info > >> > >> This patch also has the effect of having the logical cpu number > >> of the boot cpu be updated correctly independently of the ordering > >> of the cpu nodes in the device tree. > > > > So what about head_fsl_booke.S comparing boot_cpuid to -1 ? That seems > > to be broken now in at least 2 ways, boot_cpuid doesn't exist anymore > > and you don't initialize it to -1 either... > > This is 4/5 which is also waiting for your review. > > http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2011-October/093474.html Ah missed that. This is FSL specific, I'd need Kumar and/or Scott's ack for that one. Cheers, Ben.