RE: [PATCH v2] Integrated Flash Controller support

[Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1309 bytes --]

On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 11:13 +0000, Li Yang-R58472 wrote:
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Artem Bityutskiy [mailto:dedekind1@gmail.com]
> >Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 4:51 PM
> >To: Kumar Gala
> >Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; Li Yang-R58472; Liu Shuo-B35362; linux-
> >kernel@vger.kernel.org Kernel; linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Andrew
> >Morton; David Woodhouse; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org list
> >Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Integrated Flash Controller support
> >
> >On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 19:47 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> As Scott said, I was more asking about the 2nd patch in the
> sequence
> >> which did touch MTD.  Since that one is dependent on this patch,
> >> wondering how we wanted to handle them.
> >
> >I do not have time to review it, but it looks OK, so I'd suggest to
> >merge it vie the same tree as the rest of the patches.
> 
> Hi Artem,
> 
> So what is your suggestion on this patch?  Can we regard your previous
> email as an ACK and merge it through the powerpc tree?  Or do you
> prefer to merge them through the MTD tree with Kumar's ACK instead?

I am fine if it is merged via PPC tree. I do not have bandwith to look
at it closely, so I cannot ack it, although I also do not have reasons
to nack it :-)

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]