From: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: PowerPC email list <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 powerpc] fix unpaired __trace_hcall_entry and __trace_hcall_exit
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 11:54:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1325994892.5482.10.camel@ThinkPad-T61> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1325552057.23910.5.camel@pasglop>
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 11:54 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 10:06 +0800, Li Zhong wrote:
> > Unpaired calling of __trace_hcall_entry and __trace_hcall_exit could
> > cause incorrect preempt count. And it might happen as the global
> > variable hcall_tracepoint_refcount is checked separately before calling
> > them.
> >
> > I don't know much about the powerpc arch. But the idea here is to store
> > the hcall_tracepoint_refcount locally, so __trace_hcall_entry and
> > __trace_hcall_exit will be called or not called in pair by checking the
> > same value.
>
> Can you re-use an existing spot in the stack frame rather than adding
> this entry ? There's plenty of unused spots :-) For example the link
> editor doubleword is never going to be used in that function, we could
> hijack it safely. It would make the patch (and the code) simpler.
>
> Cheers,
> Ben.
Hi Ben,
Thank you for the suggestion. Below is the updated version, much less
code changes :) Would you please help review again to see whether my
understanding is correct?
Thanks,
Zhong
Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hvCall.S | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hvCall.S
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hvCall.S
index fd05fde..3ce73d0 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hvCall.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hvCall.S
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ BEGIN_FTR_SECTION; \
b 1f; \
END_FTR_SECTION(0, 1); \
ld r12,hcall_tracepoint_refcount@toc(r2); \
+ std r12,32(r1); \
cmpdi r12,0; \
beq+ 1f; \
mflr r0; \
@@ -74,7 +75,7 @@ END_FTR_SECTION(0, 1); \
BEGIN_FTR_SECTION; \
b 1f; \
END_FTR_SECTION(0, 1); \
- ld r12,hcall_tracepoint_refcount@toc(r2); \
+ ld r12,32(r1); \
cmpdi r12,0; \
beq+ 1f; \
mflr r0; \
--
1.7.5.4
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-08 3:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-19 2:06 [PATCH powerpc] fix unpaired __trace_hcall_entry and __trace_hcall_exit Li Zhong
2012-01-03 0:54 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-01-08 3:54 ` Li Zhong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1325994892.5482.10.camel@ThinkPad-T61 \
--to=zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).