From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD75EB6EE8 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:36:14 +1100 (EST) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q0P2a9dk007587 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:36:10 -0600 Message-ID: <1327458969.19850.48.camel@pasglop> Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/powernv: Fix PCI resource handling From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: linuxppc-dev Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:36:09 +1100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Recent changes to the handling of PCI resources for host bridges are breaking the PowerNV code for assigning resources on IODA. The root of the problem is that the pci_bus attached to a host bridge no longer has its "legacy" resource pointers populated but only uses the newer list instead. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt --- arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c index f31162c..5e155df 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c @@ -204,11 +204,10 @@ static void __devinit pnv_ioda_offset_bus(struct pci_bus *bus, pr_devel(" -> OBR %s [%x] +%016llx\n", bus->self ? pci_name(bus->self) : "root", flags, offset); - for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) { - r = bus->resource[i]; + pci_bus_for_each_resource(bus, r, i) { if (r && (r->flags & flags)) { - bus->resource[i]->start += offset; - bus->resource[i]->end += offset; + r->start += offset; + r->end += offset; } } list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) @@ -288,12 +287,17 @@ static void __devinit pnv_ioda_calc_bus(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int flags, * assignment algorithm is going to be uber-trivial for now, we * can try to be smarter later at filling out holes. */ - start = bus->self ? 0 : bus->resource[bres]->start; - - /* Don't hand out IO 0 */ - if ((flags & IORESOURCE_IO) && !bus->self) - start += 0x1000; - + if (bus->self) { + /* No offset for downstream bridges */ + start = 0; + } else { + /* Offset from the root */ + if (flags & IORESOURCE_IO) + /* Don't hand out IO 0 */ + start = hose->io_resource.start + 0x1000; + else + start = hose->mem_resources[0].start; + } while(!list_empty(&head)) { w = list_first_entry(&head, struct resource_wrap, link); list_del(&w->link); @@ -321,13 +325,20 @@ static void __devinit pnv_ioda_calc_bus(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int flags, empty: /* Only setup P2P's, not the PHB itself */ if (bus->self) { - WARN_ON(bus->resource[bres] == NULL); - bus->resource[bres]->start = 0; - bus->resource[bres]->flags = (*size) ? flags : 0; - bus->resource[bres]->end = (*size) ? (*size - 1) : 0; + struct resource *res = bus->resource[bres]; + + if (WARN_ON(res == NULL)) + return; - /* Clear prefetch bus resources for now */ - bus->resource[2]->flags = 0; + /* + * FIXME: We should probably export and call + * pci_bridge_check_ranges() to properly re-initialize + * the PCI portion of the flags here, and to detect + * what the bridge actually supports. + */ + res->start = 0; + res->flags = (*size) ? flags : 0; + res->end = (*size) ? (*size - 1) : 0; } pr_devel("<- CBR %s [%x] *size=%016llx *align=%016llx\n",