linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Li Yang <leoli@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/85xx: fix problem that prevents PHYS_64BIT from configurable
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:42:25 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1329468145.2892.60.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1329394210-1014-1-git-send-email-leoli@freescale.com>

On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 20:10 +0800, Li Yang wrote:
> Fix the problem that large physical address support cannot be
> disabled when some platforms which only provides 36-bit support
> are selected.  According to the philosophy of kernel config
> enabling a platform support doesn't mean the kernel is only
> running on that platform.  Remove the auto selection of PHYS_64BIT
> option for these platforms.  They will need to use a 36bit default
> config that selects PHYS_64BIT explicitly.

No, but unless I'm wrong, with your patch, enabling those platforms will
build the code ... but they won't work unless you -also- enable
PHYS_64BIT one way or another. I thus disagree.

If I enable CONFIG_P1022_DS, I expect those boards to work.

If that's going to negatively impact perfs on other boards that I also
enabled, then so be it (and we should document it in the help text).

Cheers,
Ben.

> The reason why we need to keep PHYS_64BIT option configurable is
> that enabling it cause negative performance impact on various
> aspects like TLB miss and physical address manipulating.  We should
> not enable it unless really needed, e.g. use large memory of 4GB
> or bigger.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Li Yang <leoli@freescale.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig |    6 ------
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig
> index d7946be..d9bc0bd 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig
> @@ -80,7 +80,6 @@ config P1010_RDB
>  config P1022_DS
>  	bool "Freescale P1022 DS"
>  	select DEFAULT_UIMAGE
> -	select PHYS_64BIT	# The DTS has 36-bit addresses
>  	select SWIOTLB
>  	help
>  	  This option enables support for the Freescale P1022DS reference board.
> @@ -175,7 +174,6 @@ config P2041_RDB
>  	bool "Freescale P2041 RDB"
>  	select DEFAULT_UIMAGE
>  	select PPC_E500MC
> -	select PHYS_64BIT
>  	select SWIOTLB
>  	select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
>  	select GPIO_MPC8XXX
> @@ -188,7 +186,6 @@ config P3041_DS
>  	bool "Freescale P3041 DS"
>  	select DEFAULT_UIMAGE
>  	select PPC_E500MC
> -	select PHYS_64BIT
>  	select SWIOTLB
>  	select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
>  	select GPIO_MPC8XXX
> @@ -201,7 +198,6 @@ config P3060_QDS
>  	bool "Freescale P3060 QDS"
>  	select DEFAULT_UIMAGE
>  	select PPC_E500MC
> -	select PHYS_64BIT
>  	select SWIOTLB
>  	select GPIO_MPC8XXX
>  	select HAS_RAPIDIO
> @@ -213,7 +209,6 @@ config P4080_DS
>  	bool "Freescale P4080 DS"
>  	select DEFAULT_UIMAGE
>  	select PPC_E500MC
> -	select PHYS_64BIT
>  	select SWIOTLB
>  	select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
>  	select GPIO_MPC8XXX
> @@ -229,7 +224,6 @@ config P5020_DS
>  	select DEFAULT_UIMAGE
>  	select E500
>  	select PPC_E500MC
> -	select PHYS_64BIT
>  	select SWIOTLB
>  	select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
>  	select GPIO_MPC8XXX

      parent reply	other threads:[~2012-02-17  8:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-16 12:10 [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/85xx: fix problem that prevents PHYS_64BIT from configurable Li Yang
2012-02-16 12:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/85xx: add a 36-bit corenet default config Li Yang
2012-02-16 15:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/85xx: fix problem that prevents PHYS_64BIT from configurable Tabi Timur-B04825
2012-02-16 15:57   ` Tabi Timur-B04825
2012-02-17  1:27 ` Kumar Gala
2012-02-17  4:32   ` Li Yang-R58472
2012-02-17  8:43     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-02-17 16:22   ` Tabi Timur-B04825
2012-02-17 21:10     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-02-17 21:17       ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-17 23:01       ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-18  0:56         ` Scott Wood
2012-02-18  2:19           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-02-20 20:30             ` Scott Wood
2012-02-17  8:42 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1329468145.2892.60.camel@pasglop \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=leoli@freescale.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).