From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5B36B6EEE for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:55:12 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <1329962108.20389.19.camel@pasglop> Subject: Re: powerpc/mpic: Fix allocation of reverse-map for multi-ISU mpics From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Grant Likely Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:55:08 +1100 In-Reply-To: <20120223013947.GC3212@ponder.secretlab.ca> References: <1329954613.20389.15.camel@pasglop> <20120223013947.GC3212@ponder.secretlab.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 18:39 -0700, Grant Likely wrote: > > Looks fine to me. This will conflict with the irqdomain tree in linux-next, > but it will be a trivial fixup. Still, if you prefer I can pick this > up into my tree. Well, I'm also going to carry a slightly modified variant of Kyle's mpic series so we'll have to deal with conflicts regardless, I'll keep that one. What I might do tho is pull your tree in powerpc-next at some point, when you tell me it's frozen solid, this will potentially make my life easier. Cheers, Ben.