From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9BBEB6FEE for ; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 08:11:52 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <1333491102.3040.12.camel@pasglop> Subject: Re: [REGRESSION][PATCH V4 3/3] bpf jit: Let the powerpc jit handle negative offsets From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: David Miller Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 08:11:42 +1000 In-Reply-To: <20120403.180302.342779808900865443.davem@davemloft.net> References: <4F75CA89.4010709@googlemail.com> <4F75D2A5.7060407@googlemail.com> <20120403.180302.342779808900865443.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: kaffeemonster@googlemail.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, matt@ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 18:03 -0400, David Miller wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Jan Seiffert > > > > I have only compile tested this, -ENOHARDWARE. > > Can someone with more powerpc kung-fu review and maybe test this? > > Esp. powerpc asm is not my strong point. I think i botched the > > stack frame in the call setup. Help? > > I'm not applying this until a powerpc person tests it. > > Also, we have an ARM JIT in the tree which probably needs to > be fixed similarly. Matt's having a look at powerpc Cheers, Ben.