From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A495DDE23 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:03:08 +1000 (EST) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Iju7j-0003Fg-LH for linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 03:03:03 -0700 Message-ID: <13339930.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 03:03:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Misbah khan To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Difference between ioremap() and phy_to_virt() Kernel function MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi all Could you Please let me know what is the difference between ioremap() and phy_to_virt() function being provided by the Kernel. --Misbah -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Difference-between-ioremap%28%29-and-phy_to_virt%28%29-Kernel-function-tf4669833.html#a13339930 Sent from the linuxppc-embedded mailing list archive at Nabble.com.