From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.gna.ch (darkcity.gna.ch [195.226.6.51]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B6C3B6EEC for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 00:31:56 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <1334759498.5989.328.camel@thor.local> Subject: Re: PowerPC radeon KMS - is it possible? From: Michel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E4nzer?= To: Andreas Schwab Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:31:38 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <1334730915.5989.265.camel__41553.0639271767$1334731329$gmane$org@thor.local> <1334736133.5989.278.camel@thor.local> <1334756287.5989.326.camel@thor.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: o jordan , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mit, 2012-04-18 at 16:28 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:=20 > Michel D=C3=A4nzer writes: >=20 > > Have you tried smaller aperture sizes (uninorth_agp.aperture) and/or > > radeon.test=3D1? (See commit 52f072cb084bbb460d3a4ae09f0b6efc3e7e8a8c) >=20 > Neither changes anything. How small aperture sizes have you tried? The purpose of radeon.test=3D1 isn't to change anything but to catch problems transferring data between system memory bound via AGP GART and video RAM. Does it pass for the whole AGP aperture? --=20 Earthling Michel D=C3=A4nzer | http://www.amd.c= om Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer