From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F8D9B6F62 for ; Fri, 25 May 2012 13:38:52 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <1337917105.16119.11.camel@pasglop> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] powerpc/PCI: move DMA & IRQ init to device_add() notification path From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Bjorn Helgaas Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 13:38:25 +1000 In-Reply-To: References: <20120523222635.24276.80023.stgit@bhelgaas.mtv.corp.google.com> <20120523223700.24276.76804.stgit@bhelgaas.mtv.corp.google.com> <1337914811.16119.7.camel@pasglop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Michal Simek , Hiroo Matsumoto , microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, Kenji Kaneshige , Jesse Larrew , jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, Dominik Brodowski , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 21:08 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > OK. Are you worried about cardbus in particular? > > This is headed for the 3.6, not 3.5, so we should have plenty of time. > As soon as everything for the current merge window gets merged and > -next is ready for the next batch, I'll put this in there. I'm not that worried about cardbus ... in fact I wouldn't be surprised if it's already somewhat broken, I haven't tested it in a long time... I'm more worried about basic functionality and expectations about when things happen during boot vs. platform hacks, that and pseries specific kind of hotplug which can be a bit odd. Cheers, Ben.