From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e28smtp06.in.ibm.com (e28smtp06.in.ibm.com [122.248.162.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e28smtp06.in.ibm.com", Issuer "GeoTrust SSL CA" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB834B7042 for ; Wed, 30 May 2012 19:32:07 +1000 (EST) Received: from /spool/local by e28smtp06.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 30 May 2012 15:02:03 +0530 Received: from d28av02.in.ibm.com (d28av02.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.64]) by d28relay01.in.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id q4U9W0cN63176762 for ; Wed, 30 May 2012 15:02:01 +0530 Received: from d28av02.in.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d28av02.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id q4UF2cRJ017198 for ; Thu, 31 May 2012 01:02:38 +1000 Message-ID: <1338370318.3637.12.camel@ThinkPad-T420> Subject: [RFC PATCH powerpc] make CONFIG_NUMA depends on CONFIG_SMP From: Li Zhong Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 17:31:58 +0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Paul Mackerras , PowerPC email list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , I'm not sure whether it makes sense to add this dependency to avoid CONFI_NUMA && !CONFIG_SMP. I want to do this because I saw some build errors on next-tree when compiling with CONFIG_SMP disabled, and it seems they are caused by some codes under the CONFIG_NUMA #ifdefs. Signed-off-by: Li Zhong --- arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig index 050cb37..b2aa74b 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig @@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ config IRQ_ALL_CPUS config NUMA bool "NUMA support" - depends on PPC64 + depends on PPC64 && SMP default y if SMP && PPC_PSERIES config NODES_SHIFT -- 1.7.1