From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 648E2B72E0 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 19:15:03 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <1338542089.16119.48.camel@pasglop> Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] powerpc: Add MSR_DE to MSR_KERNEL From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Bob Cochran Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 19:14:49 +1000 In-Reply-To: <4FC62018.3040404@mindchasers.com> References: <1338363814-19565-1-git-send-email-Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se> <4FC62018.3040404@mindchasers.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, support@abatron.ch List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 09:26 -0400, Bob Cochran wrote: > I believe that additional patches are required for CodeWarrior to > work > properly (e.g., assembly start up). I think the patches should come > from Freescale. For whatever reason, they include them in their SDK, > but haven't submitted them for inclusion in the mainline. > > As a developer on Freescale Power products, I would like to see > Freescale offer up a CodeWarrior patch set, so I don't have to manage > the patches myself when working outside the SDK (i.e., on a more > recent > kernel). Such patches would have a hard time getting upstream considering that codewarrior is a commercial product. Ben.