From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from labridge.com (perches-mx.perches.com [206.117.179.246]) (using SSLv3 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 856B42C0203 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 03:15:10 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <1341854107.6118.11.camel@joe2Laptop> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] printk: Have printk() never buffer its data From: Joe Perches To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 10:15:07 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20120709170956.GB24728@kroah.com> References: <1341492628.834.3.camel@mop> <30233.1341535279@neuling.org> <29711.1341545979@neuling.org> <30343.1341546469@neuling.org> <21892.1341608647@neuling.org> <1341770155.1011.27.camel@mop> <20120709170956.GB24728@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Michael Neuling , Kay Sievers , LKML , Steven Rostedt , "Paul E. McKenney" , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Andrew Morton , Wu Fengguang , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 10:09 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > is it ok if we > just merge this in 3.6-rc1 and backport it to 3.5.1 if it looks ok > there? I'd prefer it get accepted now so that refactoring the printk subsystem could occur for 3.6. Another option would be to revert all Kay's changes to the printk subsystem, fix this in 3.6 and refactor in 3.7.