linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] More fixes for lazy IRQ vs. idle
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 17:49:40 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1341906580.2561.13.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21083.1341900615@neuling.org>

On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 16:10 +1000, Michael Neuling wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> 
> > Looks like we still have issues with pSeries and Cell idle code
> > vs. the lazy irq state. In fact, the reset fixes that went upstream
> > are exposing the problem more by causing BUG_ON() to trigger (which
> > this patch turns into a WARN_ON instead).
> 
> Do we need to cc stable for 3.4 or is this new stuff only effecting us
> since the 3.5 merge window?

That's probably stable business, I'll check that before I send it to
Linus.

Cheers,
Ben.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-10  7:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-10  3:38 [PATCH] More fixes for lazy IRQ vs. idle Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-07-10  6:10 ` Michael Neuling
2012-07-10  7:49   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2012-07-10  8:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1341906580.2561.13.camel@pasglop \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mikey@neuling.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).