From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91BB42C007F for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 13:22:17 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <1343100106.3715.2.camel@pasglop> Subject: Re: next/mmotm unbootable on G5: irqdomain From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Grant Likely Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 13:21:46 +1000 In-Reply-To: References: <1343011543.2957.2.camel@pasglop> <1343082371.2957.39.camel@pasglop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Hugh Dickins , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Milton Miller , Paul Mundt , Rob Herring , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Thomas Gleixner List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 16:32 -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > > As-is I'm backing off from the linear/legacy/tree merge patch as just > > too risky. I've already pulled that stuff out of linux-next. > > Can I pull you pseries fix into my tree (my preference), or do I need > to rebase on top of yours? The mpic fix for the g5 is in Linus tree already, I added it on top of powerpc -next before I asked Linus to pull. For pseries (ie the fix for irq_find_mapping vs. radix), I don't have a formal patch, just the one I hand typed in my previous email, so do whatever you want with it. Cheers, Ben.