From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAAB42C008B for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 12:56:36 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <1346900172.19098.17.camel@pasglop> Subject: Re: [powerpc:next 24/29] drivers/atm/fore200e.h:263:3: error: redefinition of typedef 'opcode_t' with different type From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Fengguang Wu Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 12:56:12 +1000 In-Reply-To: <20120906021929.GA16076@localhost> References: <20120906021929.GA16076@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Meelis Roos , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 10:19 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > Hi Ananth, > > FYI, kernel build failed on > > tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/benh/powerpc.git next > head: 8b64a9dfb091f1eca8b7e58da82f1e7d1d5fe0ad > commit: 8b7b80b9ebb46dd88fbb94e918297295cf312b59 [24/29] powerpc: Uprobes port to powerpc > config: powerpc-allmodconfig (attached as .config) > > All related error/warning messages: > > In file included from drivers/atm/fore200e.c:70:0: > drivers/atm/fore200e.h:263:3: error: redefinition of typedef 'opcode_t' with different type > arch/powerpc/include/asm/probes.h:25:13: note: previous declaration of 'opcode_t' was here This is a bit more annoying. Ananth, do we need that to be called opcode_t for generic reasons or can we make it ppc_opcode_t ? If it has to remain, I suppose we can try to change that ATM driver to use a different type name... (CC'ing Dave and Meelis who from the git history *might* have HW access to test a possible patch). Cheers, Ben.