From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com (e35.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.153]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e35.co.us.ibm.com", Issuer "GeoTrust SSL CA" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E41532C0082 for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 03:42:27 +1100 (EST) Received: from /spool/local by e35.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 09:42:24 -0700 Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by d03dlp02.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6463E40055 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 09:42:18 -0700 (MST) Received: from d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (d03av05.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.85]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id qATGg99b232698 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 09:42:09 -0700 Received: from d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id qATGg8wk030096 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 09:42:08 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/oprofile: Fix error in oprofile power7_marked_instr_event() function From: "Carl E. Love" To: bherren@au1.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 08:42:03 -0800 Message-ID: <1354207323.5963.49.camel@oc5587145178.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Ben: Please review the following patch. If it is acceptable, will you please commit it to the mainline tree. Thanks. Carl Love P.S. Looks like I sent it to the wrong mailing list the first time to get it into the patch queue. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- powerpc/oprofile: Fix error in oprofile power7_marked_instr_event() function The calculation for the left shift of the mask OPROFILE_PM_PMCSEL_MSK has an error. The calculation is should be to shift left by (max_cntrs - cntr) times the width of the pmsel field width. However, the #define OPROFILE_MAX_PMC_NUM was used instead of OPROFILE_PMSEL_FIELD_WIDTH. This patch fixes the calculation. Signed-off-by: Carl Love --- arch/powerpc/oprofile/op_model_power4.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/oprofile/op_model_power4.c b/arch/powerpc/oprofile/op_model_power4.c index 315f949..f444b94 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/oprofile/op_model_power4.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/oprofile/op_model_power4.c @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static int power7_marked_instr_event(u64 mmcr1) for (pmc = 0; pmc < 4; pmc++) { psel = mmcr1 & (OPROFILE_PM_PMCSEL_MSK << (OPROFILE_MAX_PMC_NUM - pmc) - * OPROFILE_MAX_PMC_NUM); + * OPROFILE_PMSEL_FIELD_WIDTH); psel = (psel >> ((OPROFILE_MAX_PMC_NUM - pmc) * OPROFILE_PMSEL_FIELD_WIDTH)) & ~1ULL; unit = mmcr1 & (OPROFILE_PM_UNIT_MSK -- 1.7.12.rc1.22.gbfbf4d4