From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>,
Cong Ding <dinggnu@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@windriver.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: kernel/kgdb.c: fix memory leakage
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 13:41:13 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1360291273.2650.52.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <510B22C2.90606@windriver.com>
On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 20:04 -0600, Jason Wessel wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c
> > index 8747447..5ca82cd 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c
> > @@ -154,12 +154,12 @@ static int kgdb_handle_breakpoint(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > static int kgdb_singlestep(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > {
> > struct thread_info *thread_info, *exception_thread_info;
> > - struct thread_info *backup_current_thread_info = \
> > - (struct thread_info *)kmalloc(sizeof(struct thread_info), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + struct thread_info *backup_current_thread_info;
>
>
>
> Woh... This is definitely wrong. You have found a problem for sure,
> but this is not the right way to fix it.
>
> It is not a good idea to kmalloc while single stepping because you can
> hang the kernel if you single step any operation in kmalloc().
Ok. I applied the fix because it was obviously correct vs. the previous
version of the code (ie. the kmalloc was already there)
> I am in the process of going through all the kgdb mails from the last
> few months while I had been away from the project, so I didn't catch
> this one and I see it has upstream commit (fefd9e6f8). I'll submit
> another patch to fix this the right way and use a static variable.
> This is ok to use a static variable here because this is not something
> we can recursively call at a single CPU level.
But a static will be shared by all CPUs or do you mean a per-cpu one ?
> If Ben prefers we not burn the memory unless kgdb is active we can
> kmalloc / kfree the space we need at the time that kgdb is
> initialized. Else we can go with this patch you see below. We'll see
> what Ben desires.
What about the stack ? thread info isn't very big...
Cheers,
Ben.
> -----
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c
> index a7bc752..bb12c8b 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c
> @@ -151,15 +151,16 @@ static int kgdb_handle_breakpoint(struct pt_regs *regs)
> return 1;
> }
>
> +static struct thread_info kgdb_backup_thread_info[NR_CPUS];
> +
> static int kgdb_singlestep(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> struct thread_info *thread_info, *exception_thread_info;
> - struct thread_info *backup_current_thread_info;
> + int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
>
> if (user_mode(regs))
> return 0;
>
> - backup_current_thread_info = (struct thread_info *)kmalloc(sizeof(struct thread_info), GFP_KERNEL);
> /*
> * On Book E and perhaps other processors, singlestep is handled on
> * the critical exception stack. This causes current_thread_info()
> @@ -175,7 +176,7 @@ static int kgdb_singlestep(struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> if (thread_info != exception_thread_info) {
> /* Save the original current_thread_info. */
> - memcpy(backup_current_thread_info, exception_thread_info, sizeof *thread_info);
> + memcpy(&kgdb_backup_thread_info[cpu], exception_thread_info, sizeof *thread_info);
> memcpy(exception_thread_info, thread_info, sizeof *thread_info);
> }
>
> @@ -183,9 +184,8 @@ static int kgdb_singlestep(struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> if (thread_info != exception_thread_info)
> /* Restore current_thread_info lastly. */
> - memcpy(exception_thread_info, backup_current_thread_info, sizeof *thread_info);
> + memcpy(exception_thread_info, &kgdb_backup_thread_info[cpu], sizeof *thread_info);
>
> - kfree(backup_current_thread_info);
> return 1;
> }
>
>
> -----
>
>
> Thanks,
> Jason.
>
>
> >
> > if (user_mode(regs))
> > return 0;
> >
> > + backup_current_thread_info = (struct thread_info *)kmalloc(sizeof(struct thread_info), GFP_KERNEL);
> > /*
> > * On Book E and perhaps other processors, singlestep is handled on
> > * the critical exception stack. This causes current_thread_info()
> > @@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ static int kgdb_singlestep(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > /* Restore current_thread_info lastly. */
> > memcpy(exception_thread_info, backup_current_thread_info, sizeof *thread_info);
> >
> > + kfree(backup_current_thread_info);
> > return 1;
> > }
> >
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-08 2:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-14 17:26 [PATCH] powerpc: kernel/kgdb.c: fix memory leakage Cong Ding
2013-02-01 2:04 ` Jason Wessel
2013-02-08 2:41 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2013-02-27 2:44 ` tiejun.chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1360291273.2650.52.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=dinggnu@gmail.com \
--cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mikey@neuling.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tiejun.chen@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).