linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the powerpc tree
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:50:13 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1361425813.4676.47.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130221155208.bcb1295ab9bdecf394d48bfc@canb.auug.org.au>

On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 15:52 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Al,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the signal tree got conflicts in
> arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c and arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c
> between commit 2b0a576d15e0 ("powerpc: Add new transactional memory state
> to the signal context") from the powerpc tree and commit 7cce246557bf
> ("powerpc: switch to generic sigaltstack") from the signal tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary
> (no action is required).

Mikey, can you check everything's all right ?

I'm happy to wait for Al stuff to go in first & fixup the conflict
before I send the pull request to Linus. I'm off travelling around but I
should be able to get stuff out this week-end.

Cheers,
Ben.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-21  5:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-21  4:52 linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the powerpc tree Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-21  5:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2013-02-21 20:43   ` Michael Neuling
2013-02-21 21:30     ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1361425813.4676.47.camel@pasglop \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mikey@neuling.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).