From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79DC62C00B7 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:19:46 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <1363594759.12419.1.camel@pasglop> Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] mm: remove free_area_cache use in powerpc architecture From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Michel Lespinasse Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:19:19 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20130221230557.8BDCA5A4174@corp2gmr1-2.hot.corp.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: riel@redhat.com, dwg@au1.ibm.com, Paul Mackerras , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 01:08 -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote: > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 3:05 PM, wrote: > > From: Michel Lespinasse > > Subject: mm: remove free_area_cache use in powerpc architecture > > > > As all other architectures have been converted to use vm_unmapped_area(), > > we are about to retire the free_area_cache. > > Ping ? I haven't seen any replies from the ppc maintainers, and > powerpc is now the only remaining user of free_area_cache. Could you > please take these two patches ? Ah the ppc maintainer was totally swamped (and now on vacation) and was hoping somebody else would review & test that ... Aneesh, David, can you have a look ? Thanks ! Cheers, Ben.