From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (ch1ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.181.184]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.global.frontbridge.com", Issuer "Microsoft Secure Server Authority" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D3222C015B for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 11:35:42 +1100 (EST) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 19:34:54 -0500 From: Scott Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: add Book E support to 64-bit hibernation To: Wang Dongsheng-B40534 References: <1363949917.8238.25.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <1363990490.24790.12@snotra> In-Reply-To: (from B40534@freescale.com on Tue Apr 2 00:28:40 2013) Message-ID: <1364949294.24520.29@snotra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; delsp=Yes; format=Flowed Cc: Wood Scott-B07421 , Johannes Berg , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 04/02/2013 12:28:40 AM, Wang Dongsheng-B40534 wrote: > Hi scott & Johannes, >=20 > Thanks for reviewing. >=20 > @scott, About this patch, could you please help ack this patch? Please investigate the issue of whether we are loading kernel module =20 code in this step, and whether cache flushing is needed as a result. Is there any chance we could even be loading user code here, e.g. if =20 it's mlocked and thus couldn't be swapped out? -Scott=