From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Wang Dongsheng-B40534 <B40534@freescale.com>
Cc: Wood Scott-B07421 <B07421@freescale.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: add Book E support to 64-bit hibernation
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 13:24:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1365445496.28843.4@snotra> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ABB05CD9C9F68C46A5CEDC7F15439259EDDCAE@039-SN2MPN1-021.039d.mgd.msft.net> (from B40534@freescale.com on Sat Apr 6 22:01:45 2013)
On 04/06/2013 10:01:45 PM, Wang Dongsheng-B40534 wrote:
>=20
>=20
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wood Scott-B07421
> > Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 4:16 AM
> > To: Wang Dongsheng-B40534
> > Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; Johannes Berg; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: add Book E support to 64-bit =20
> hibernation
> >
> > On 04/03/2013 12:36:41 AM, Wang Dongsheng-B40534 wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Wood Scott-B07421
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 8:35 AM
> > > > To: Wang Dongsheng-B40534
> > > > Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; Johannes Berg; =20
> linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: add Book E support to 64-bit
> > > hibernation
> > > >
> > > > On 04/02/2013 12:28:40 AM, Wang Dongsheng-B40534 wrote:
> > > > > Hi scott & Johannes,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for reviewing.
> > > > >
> > > > > @scott, About this patch, could you please help ack this =20
> patch?
> > > >
> > > > Please investigate the issue of whether we are loading kernel =20
> module
> > > > code in this step, and whether cache flushing is needed as a =20
> result.
> > > >
> > > Sorry, I am not very clear what you mean.
> > > When the kernel boot end, modprobe some xx.ko?
> >
> > Suppose, before the kernel was suspended, modules had been loaded. =20
> At
> > what point do those modules get restored, and when does the cache =20
> get
> > flushed?
> >
> Before the kernel was suspended, modules had been loaded, the modules =20
> is
> already in memory.
They *were* in memory, until the hardware was powered down.
> And /lib/modules/* is belong to vfs.
Huh? I'm talking about modules that have been loaded, not where in the =20
filesystem they were loaded from. Loading a module is not like =20
mmap()ing a file.
> When suspend to disk, all used pages will be saved.(Include VFS, =20
> Loaded modules)
> When restore, the kernel will not modprobe again.
Of course it won't modprobe again. Still, at some point during the =20
resume process, the code has to be loaded from disk into RAM. What I =20
don't know is if this is where that happens.
> The non-bootcpu will restore all pages.(Include VFS, Loaded modules)
I don't know what "non-bootcpu" has to do with anything. What matters =20
is what piece of code does the restoring, and if the cache flush =20
properly happens then.
-Scott=
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-08 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-14 3:36 [PATCH] powerpc: add Book E support to 64-bit hibernation Wang Dongsheng
2013-03-14 8:37 ` Johannes Berg
2013-03-14 16:52 ` Scott Wood
2013-03-15 15:22 ` Johannes Berg
2013-03-18 22:12 ` Scott Wood
2013-03-19 20:55 ` Johannes Berg
2013-03-19 21:10 ` Scott Wood
2013-03-19 21:22 ` Johannes Berg
2013-03-19 22:16 ` Scott Wood
2013-03-22 10:58 ` Johannes Berg
2013-03-22 22:14 ` Scott Wood
2013-04-02 5:28 ` Wang Dongsheng-B40534
2013-04-03 0:34 ` Scott Wood
2013-04-03 5:36 ` Wang Dongsheng-B40534
2013-04-03 20:15 ` Scott Wood
2013-04-07 3:01 ` Wang Dongsheng-B40534
2013-04-08 18:24 ` Scott Wood [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1365445496.28843.4@snotra \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=B07421@freescale.com \
--cc=B40534@freescale.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).